2011
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2011.590500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crafting the TALE: Construction of a measure to assess the functions of autobiographical remembering

Abstract: Theory suggests that autobiographical remembering serves several functions. This research builds on previous empirical efforts (Bluck, Alea, Habermas, & Rubin, 2005) with the aim of constructing a brief, valid measure of three functions of autobiographical memory. Participants (N=306) completed 28 theoretically derived items concerning the frequency with which they use autobiographical memory to serve a variety of functions. To examine convergent and discriminant validity, participants rated their tendency to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
231
3
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
12
231
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we define function as "reasons for remembering" or "uses of autobiographical memory" or "motivations for remembering", consistent with explicit definitions in the cognitive memory functions literature (e.g. Bluck & Alea, 2011;Bluck, Alea, Habermas, & Rubin, 2005). That is, we do not necessarily equate function with "adaptiveness", nor make strong claims about the adaptive vs. maladaptive nature of the reasons that people give for thinking about or talking about the past, (although we return to this point and issues with determining "adaptiveness" in the Discussion).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Here, we define function as "reasons for remembering" or "uses of autobiographical memory" or "motivations for remembering", consistent with explicit definitions in the cognitive memory functions literature (e.g. Bluck & Alea, 2011;Bluck, Alea, Habermas, & Rubin, 2005). That is, we do not necessarily equate function with "adaptiveness", nor make strong claims about the adaptive vs. maladaptive nature of the reasons that people give for thinking about or talking about the past, (although we return to this point and issues with determining "adaptiveness" in the Discussion).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Recent approaches have further differentiated self and social functions of autobiographical remembering (for an overview, see Pillemer, 2009). Functions of AM can be assessed with self-reports, like the Thinking about Life Experiences Questionnaire (TALE; Bluck & Alea, 2011), but individuals may have only limited introspective insight into their own memory activities (Pillemer, 2009). Research therefore focuses also on the narrative structure of autobiographical memories, which do not require an individual to arrive at introspective judgments about memory usage.…”
Section: Narrative Structure As An Indicator Of Autobiographical Memomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, autobiographical memories are more than vivid remembrances: they also have functional significance. Memories of one's personal past are thought to be used for at least three broad categories (Bluck, 2003;Bluck, Alea, Habermas, & Rubin, 2005;Bluck & Alea, 2011): planning and decision-making (directive functions), maintaining a sense of a continuous self over time (self functions), and maintaining and developing relationships (social functions).…”
Section: The Argument: Fictional Events As Part Of the Autobiographicmentioning
confidence: 99%