Crafting smallholder-driven agricultural research systems in Southern Africa

Abstract

Summary. -The National Agricultural Research Systems (NARSs) in sub-Saharan Africa have made enormous progress over the past four decades in replacing European with African scientists, increasing the number of scientists and shifting priorities from export to food corps. Nevertheless, most NARSs are having difficulty in producing a steady stream of new technologies for small-scale farms and in generating adequate financial support from their governments. Zimbabwe and Malawi are among the first countries in Africa to mount indigenous-led reforms of their NARSs. This paper documents the steps taken by the Agricultural Research Council of Zimbabwe to generate a consensus among scientists, farmers and policy makers to reform the National Agricultural Research System by increasing the voice of smallholders and other stakeholders in setting research priorities, making scientists more accountable to smallholders and generating new sources of financial support from user fees and taxes on commodities. Malawi is pursuing a commodity approach to revitalizing its NARSs. The experience of both Zimbabwe and Malawi has shown that there is no blueprint for reforming NARSs in Africa. Donors can assist the reform process by supporting local initiatives to craft smallholder-driven research systems that are staffed with accountable scientists who are adequately financed from local sources.

Systems of innovation theory and the changing architecture of agricultural research in Africa

“…Perhaps it is now time, as previously suggested by Rukuni et al (1998), to allow national characteristics and differences to come to the fore. A different, less directive approach to support for agricultural research may also give more room for the development of the all important demand-side.…”

Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: an innovation systems view of what it is and how to develop it

“…Yet despite the fact that financial support for agricultural research has declined and the mechanisms for sustaining support have failed to materialise (Rukuni et al, 1998;Echier 1989) there are more serious concerns about the appropriateness of traditional agricultural research arrangements and the apparent inability of these to adapt to the changing agricultural scenario (Hall et al, 2000;Byerlee and Alex 2002). In many senses the contemporary scenario is markedly different to earlier eras.…”

Private‐sector investment in R&D: a review of policy options to promote its growth in developing‐country agriculture

“…First, growth in public expenditure on agricultural R&D has stagnated in many developing countries, with noticeable declines across SubSaharan Africa (Pardey & Beintema, 2001;Pardey et al, 2006). Public research organizations are increasingly viewed as inefficient and inflexible bureaucracies, dependent on donor funding and declining in their ability to produce much-needed high-quality R&D outputs (Byerlee, 1998;Rukuni, Blackie, & Eicher, 1998). The international agricultural research system is struggling to redefine its own strategic roles and responsibilities, raising issues about its ability to support and strengthen its national public partners (Spielman, 2007;World Bank, 2004).…”