Crafting Mosaics: Person‐Centered Religious Influence and Selection in Adolescent Friendships

Abstract

This research addresses the intersection of two key domains of adolescents’ lives: religion and peer networks. Religion scholars argue that religion is multi‐faceted and better understood by focusing on combinations of indicators (i.e., mosaics), versus a variable‐centered approach. We adopt this framework and investigate the interplay between religion and peer networks, both in how religious mosaics are shaped by friends and how religious profiles affect friend selection dynamics. With data from two schools in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, we estimate religious mosaics using latent class analysis (LCA) to identify profiles consisting of combinations of commonly available survey‐based measures of religious attitudes, behaviors, and identities. Finding evidence of theoretically expected profiles, we then use stochastic actor–based models (SABMs) to investigate network dynamics for these LCA‐based religious profiles. We demonstrate how the profile data can be integrated within the SABM framework to evaluate processes of friend selection and influence. Results show evidence of adolescents influencing one another's religious mosaics, but not selecting friends on that basis.

Are Birds of a Feather Praying Together? Assessing Friends’ Influence on Muslim Youths’ Religiosity in Germany

“…The conclusion, however, that religion rather than religiosity shapes youths' friendship choices contrasts with findings from studies in the United States that found evidence of friendship selection on religiosity (Adams, Schaefer, and Ettekal 2020;Cheadle and Schwadel 2012;Cook, Schwadel, and Cheadle 2017). Because these studies examined youths that were older than those in our sample, developmental differences are one possible explanation for diverging findings because younger youths may be less able than older ones to accurately observe their peers' religiosity.…”

Assortative Matching of Tourists and Destinations: Agents or Algorithms?

“…Historically, destination matching has been performed principally by travel agents, who possess knowledge of both destinations and clients. Many tourists have activity preferences, or other criteria restricting destination choice [4,[92][93][94]. This shrinks the sets sufficiently to be matched by specialist travel agents or social-media groups, as in wildlife or adventure tourism [92][93][94][95].…”

Religious belief alignment: The structure of cultural beliefs from adolescence to emerging adulthood

“…Consequently, this article calls for an examination of how religious belief systems are organized. Considering the rich methodological work carried out in studies on the measurement of religiosity (Adams, Schaefer, and Ettekal 2020;Cornwall et al 1986;Pearce, Foster, and Hardie 2013;Pearce et al 2017), the question of how different dimensions change the belief structure and affect one another can be promising.…”