2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-017-0470-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crafting consensus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism exploited by the vote buyer in our model relies on pivotality and is not present in the literature on vote‐buying with expressive preferences, e.g., in Zápal (2017), members' responses to a bribe are uncertain, but pivotal considerations are absent because members do not take into account the effect of their vote on the outcome. Groseclose and Snyder (1996), Banks (2000), Dekel, Jackson, and Wolinsky (2008), Morgan and Várdy (2011), and Iaryczower and Oliveros (2017) also assume expressive preferences and introduce a second vote buyer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism exploited by the vote buyer in our model relies on pivotality and is not present in the literature on vote‐buying with expressive preferences, e.g., in Zápal (2017), members' responses to a bribe are uncertain, but pivotal considerations are absent because members do not take into account the effect of their vote on the outcome. Groseclose and Snyder (1996), Banks (2000), Dekel, Jackson, and Wolinsky (2008), Morgan and Várdy (2011), and Iaryczower and Oliveros (2017) also assume expressive preferences and introduce a second vote buyer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%