2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00332-007-9008-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cracks in Complex Bodies: Covariance of Tip Balances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1]). The view can include non-conservative body forces when we evaluate the first variation of the energy balance [3], along the guidelines of the Marsden-Hughes theorem [1], or dissipative stresses, by considering a d'Alembert-Lagrange-type principle, as suggested in Mariano [4] within the general setting of the mechanics of complex materials. When dissipation plays the role that we recognize in standard viscosity and plasticity, a covariance approach based on the first principle of thermodynamics is no more entirely satisfactory for it does not furnish indications on the possible dissipative component of the stress (the one occurring in viscoelasticity) and, above all, the expression of the dissipation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1]). The view can include non-conservative body forces when we evaluate the first variation of the energy balance [3], along the guidelines of the Marsden-Hughes theorem [1], or dissipative stresses, by considering a d'Alembert-Lagrange-type principle, as suggested in Mariano [4] within the general setting of the mechanics of complex materials. When dissipation plays the role that we recognize in standard viscosity and plasticity, a covariance approach based on the first principle of thermodynamics is no more entirely satisfactory for it does not furnish indications on the possible dissipative component of the stress (the one occurring in viscoelasticity) and, above all, the expression of the dissipation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards the morphological descriptor maps, constitutive assumptions on the structure of M are are necessary: (a) M is Riemannian with (at least) C 1 −metric g M , and (b) covariant derivatives are explicitly calculated by making use of the natural Levi-Civita connection. A metric over M has non-trivial physical meaning with respect to the representation of the (independent) substructural kinetic energy (when it exists) and a consequent influence on the representation of the microstress (see [1] and [2]). The C 1 −Riemannian structure (assumption (a) above) implies that M can be isometrically embedded in R N by Nash theorem: it is considered here as a closed submanifold in some linear space isomorphic to R N for some appropriate N .…”
Section: Ground States Of Elastic Complex Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle and also its formulation initiated a long and unfinished discussion among those who are interested in the fundamental aspects of continuum physics. Here we give an incomplete list of the most important looking related works [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%