2003
DOI: 10.1002/qua.10478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cracking the genetic code(s) with a modular determinative degree: An algebraic approach

Abstract: ABSTRACT:We introduce a new "modular" (compositional and positional) determinative degree for the four bases U, C, A, and G to define a "Dinucleotide charge number" for the dinucleotides, which discriminates between the two octets of dinucleotides: M 1 and M 2 . These two components are exchanged under a transformation, which, we show, implements the Rumer symmetry. We invoke also the base "size index" of Rosen as a complementary determinative degree for the third-base component of a codon. Next, we define … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref. 3, we started from the constituents of the four nitrogenous bases, that is, the hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen atoms, written as 2 × 2 matrices [see Eq. (7)], and were led, after constructing the molecules U , C , A , and G using ordinary matrix multiplication, to the following base matrix: In this article, we improve the formalism by using a new concatenated “Kronecker”‐like product, defined in the Appendix, to take into account the noncommutativity of the bases (e.g., UA is not the same as AU ).…”
Section: Symmetries Of the 16 Genetic Code‐doubletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Ref. 3, we started from the constituents of the four nitrogenous bases, that is, the hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen atoms, written as 2 × 2 matrices [see Eq. (7)], and were led, after constructing the molecules U , C , A , and G using ordinary matrix multiplication, to the following base matrix: In this article, we improve the formalism by using a new concatenated “Kronecker”‐like product, defined in the Appendix, to take into account the noncommutativity of the bases (e.g., UA is not the same as AU ).…”
Section: Symmetries Of the 16 Genetic Code‐doubletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that M 1 contains doublets for which the third base in the triplet (codon) is irrelevant (for coding an amino acid) while in M 2 the knowledge of the third base is necessary (except, of course, for the singlets). Comparison of (3) and (5.1) shows that the transformation R 1 effectively implements the Rumer symmetry ( CUGA ↔ AGUC , see 3). It is transparent from Eq.…”
Section: Symmetries Of the 16 Genetic Code‐doubletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations