1992
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1172)
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cracking Response of RC Members Subjected to Uniaxial Tension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This term seems rather related to the fact that the internal cracks become smaller and eventually close as the distance increases from the steel bar in cases of large covers instead of the elastic shear deformations, which normally are considered negligible . DIN, however, has abandoned the cover term and calculates the maximum transfer length according to Equation , though not exceeding L=14σsϕ1.8fctm, which accounts for the fact that the transfer length varies in the crack formation stage as stated by …”
Section: The Theoretical Background For Crack Width Calculations Of Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This term seems rather related to the fact that the internal cracks become smaller and eventually close as the distance increases from the steel bar in cases of large covers instead of the elastic shear deformations, which normally are considered negligible . DIN, however, has abandoned the cover term and calculates the maximum transfer length according to Equation , though not exceeding L=14σsϕ1.8fctm, which accounts for the fact that the transfer length varies in the crack formation stage as stated by …”
Section: The Theoretical Background For Crack Width Calculations Of Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(b)), given by a single bar embedded in a concrete cylinder [3,9] with thickness equal to the minimum cover to the bar, c min , is not reliable. In fact, when a moment gradient exists in the beam, a consequent steel stress gradient develops (f s0 = f sL ) and, the equilibrium of the cylindrical element in Fig.…”
Section: Shear Stress Distribution At the Tip Crack Planementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that, in RC structures, taking account of the tension stiffening effect, which results from the bond slip between steel reinforcement and the surrounding concrete, produces more accurate RC member deformation predictions when a nonlinear FE analysis adopting the smeared crack concept is undertaken (e.g., Wu et al, 1991). Tension stiffening models based on the steel‐to‐concrete interface bond‐slip mechanism are widely available (e.g., Floegl and Mang, 1982; CEB‐FIP, 1985; Gupta and Maestrini, 1990; Okamura and Maekawa, 1991; Wu et al, 1991; Russo and Romano, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%