2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cracking localization and reduced ductility in fiber-reinforced concrete beams with low reinforcement ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
30
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the meaning of 'ductile response' could be incorrectly delivered to readers because no test results of reinforced UHPC beams without fiber were reported. In accordance with the test results by Yoo and Yoon (2015), reinforced UHPFRC beams exhibited lower ductility indices compared to beams without fiber due to the crack localization behavior, and Dancygier and Berkover (2016) also reported that the inclusion of steel fibers resulted in a decrease of flexural ductility of beams with low conventional reinforcement ratios. Yang et al (2011) examined the flexural behavior of largescale prestressed UHPFRC I-beams.…”
Section: Flexural Dominated Reinforced Uhpfrc Beams Girders and Comsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, the meaning of 'ductile response' could be incorrectly delivered to readers because no test results of reinforced UHPC beams without fiber were reported. In accordance with the test results by Yoo and Yoon (2015), reinforced UHPFRC beams exhibited lower ductility indices compared to beams without fiber due to the crack localization behavior, and Dancygier and Berkover (2016) also reported that the inclusion of steel fibers resulted in a decrease of flexural ductility of beams with low conventional reinforcement ratios. Yang et al (2011) examined the flexural behavior of largescale prestressed UHPFRC I-beams.…”
Section: Flexural Dominated Reinforced Uhpfrc Beams Girders and Comsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The flexural model presented in Section 4 is compared to 4-point bending tests conducted by Pfyl and Marti 2001, Dancygier and Berkover 2016, Mertol et al 2015and Yoo and Moon 2018. Table 2 summarizes the specimen properties and assumed values used in the analyses (if any).…”
Section: Sfrc Flexural Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon can occur in both normal‐ and high‐strength concretes that include the steel fiber and conventional reinforcement. Some publications pointed out to its negative effect on the flexural ductility for relatively low reinforcement ratios . Moreover, the volumetric ratio of fiber is another parameter affecting the beam ductility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some publications pointed out to its negative effect on the flexural ductility for relatively low reinforcement ratios. 5,[9][10][11][12][13] Moreover, the volumetric ratio of fiber is another parameter affecting the beam ductility. In order to ensure sufficient ductility for the beams, the volumetric ratio and fiber type must be compatible with tensile reinforcement ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%