2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10704-012-9762-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack propagation criteria in three dimensions using the XFEM and an explicit–implicit crack description

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as previously noticed in the literature [31,34,10,37], we also observed that the crack path is very sensitive to small changes in geometry and loading, or to changes in the regularization parameter . Figure 19 shows changes in the final fracture geometry (isovolume renderings of the fracture field 0.9 ≤ α ≤ 1.0) and the final deformed geometry for three different values of .…”
Section: The Brokenshire Torsion Experimentssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as previously noticed in the literature [31,34,10,37], we also observed that the crack path is very sensitive to small changes in geometry and loading, or to changes in the regularization parameter . Figure 19 shows changes in the final fracture geometry (isovolume renderings of the fracture field 0.9 ≤ α ≤ 1.0) and the final deformed geometry for three different values of .…”
Section: The Brokenshire Torsion Experimentssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We finally focussed our attention on a fully three-dimensional problem initially presented in [24] and previously investigated in a number of articles [31,34,10,37]. The Brokenshire test consists of a specimen with a 45 • oblique notch subject to a torsional load (see Figure 17 for a schematic description of the domain geometry).…”
Section: The Brokenshire Torsion Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of enrichment functions was accordingly taken into account with meshless methods [5], isogeometric analysis (IGA) [6]. In regard to the application in fracture mechanics, XFEM has been successfully employed in modeling crack propagation [7][8][9], cohesive fracture [10,11], cracks with multiple branches [3,12], three dimensional crack growth [13,14], etc. With the two-dimensional analysis of XFEM, a domain is divided into non-overlapping subdomains, which are normally comprised of triangular or quadrilateral elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sukumar uses the XFEM and the fast stepping method to simulate the 3D fatigue crack propagation, and uses the fast stepping method and the Paris formula to simulate the crack tip movement [3]. Baydoun studies of the reliability of different crack propagation criterion under the XFEM and 3D fracture mechanics method, concludes that the maximum energy release rate criterion and the maximum circumferential tensile stress criterion can be used to accurately describe the crack propagation process [4,5]. Baietto combines the experimental results and the XFEM to simulate 2D and 3D contact fatigue crack growth [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%