2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra06518b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack growth mechanism of natural rubber under fatigue loading studied by a real-time crack tip morphology monitoring method

Abstract: Tear energy dependence of NR crack tip morphology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…60 In brief, a Metravib DMA+1000 dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) system was used to perform the crack growth test. 60 In brief, a Metravib DMA+1000 dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) system was used to perform the crack growth test.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 In brief, a Metravib DMA+1000 dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) system was used to perform the crack growth test. 60 In brief, a Metravib DMA+1000 dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) system was used to perform the crack growth test.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher energy consumption during cyclic loading is also demonstrated and reflected by the crack‐tip morphology monitoring. According to our previous study, there are two kinds of cracking morphologies observed for NR, that is, ligament break‐up morphology which needs less energy input; and surface peeling morphology which consume more energy. In this work, we also conducted the crack‐tip morphology monitoring by the crack growth test system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…48 Certainly, heat build-up should be ignored for quasistatic fracture. Based on the theory proposed by Persson et al, 45 an expression which described the relationship between J″ and tearing energy G (ν) at a certain crack growth rate ν was proposed and presented in Equation (6). As a typical example, values of HED and H (%) under strain of 50% are shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Hysteresis Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%