2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack growth in masonry: Numerical analysis and sensitivity study for discrete and smeared crack modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major differences in assigned and apparent Poisson's ratios for both masonry components here investigated shed light on differences observed between their behavior in standalone tests and as observed in masonry composites under mechanical loading, as for example by optical methods such as Digital Image Correlation [2]. These differences are noted even at the central area of the linear branch in the response of the masonry composite.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Mmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major differences in assigned and apparent Poisson's ratios for both masonry components here investigated shed light on differences observed between their behavior in standalone tests and as observed in masonry composites under mechanical loading, as for example by optical methods such as Digital Image Correlation [2]. These differences are noted even at the central area of the linear branch in the response of the masonry composite.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Mmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A N U S C R I P T 4 Sophisticated numerical approaches are often required for the detailed analysis of masonry structures. Analysis methods for masonry in the macro-scale are able to capture the behavior of the material at the composite level [1], but are often reliant on the characterization of entire masonry samples [2], which present severe difficulties in their extraction and destructive testing. Micromodeling approaches, on the other hand, rely on the distinct modeling of the material phases of the composite in order to achieve result completeness and a direct simulation of the interaction of the units and the mortar [3,4].…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since no physical contact and no attached instruments are required for the application, DIC can be applied to samples of small size, on which the attachment of physical measurement devices is difficult or impossible. This technique has been applied to both masonry materials (Drdácký et al, 2008) and entire members (Bejarano-Urrego et al, 2018;Thamboo et al, 2013). The use of DIC on masonry at the member scale has been generally used for the tracking of the formation of cracks and the evaluation of their width under increasing load, at which point the deformations are mostly concentrated at the failure lines and of a significant magnitude (Cotič et al, 2014;Nghiem et al, 2015;Ramos et al, 2015).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adopted material properties are listed in Table 4; they were chosen after a calibration procedure (Bejarano-Urrego et al, 2018) taking into account the experimental data from the tests on small samples and panels as well as data from literature (Drougkas et al, 2015;Giardina et al, 2015;Noort, 2012;Rots, 1997;Van der Pluijm et al, 2000). The interfaces are assigned the compressive strength of the wallettes in the vertical direction.…”
Section: Meso-modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, cracking or even damage of masonry structures caused by differential settlement has gained more attention. e main methods to study the crack initiation and propagation in masonry structures subjected to vertical settlement include theoretical analysis [1,2], numerical simulation [3][4][5][6][7], and laboratory test. Numerical tools have been favorably preferred over the analytical method, given the complex mechanical response and the irregular geometries of the masonry structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%