Volume 2: Mechanics and Behavior of Active Materials; Structural Health Monitoring; Bioinspired Smart Materials and Systems; En 2018
DOI: 10.1115/smasis2018-8190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack Growth Behavior in NiTi Shape Memory Alloys Under Mode-I Isothermal Loading: Effect of Stress State

Abstract: Fracture behavior in nickel-titanium (NiTi) shape memory alloys (SMAs) subjected to mode-I, isothermal loading is studied using finite element analysis (FEA). Compact tension (CT) SMA specimen is modeled in Abaqus finite element suite and crack growth under displacement boundary condition is investigated for plane strain and plane stress conditions. Parameters for the SMA material constitutive law implemented in the finite element setup are acquired from characterization tests conducted on near-equiatomic NiTi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moving towards the middle, the stress state tends to plane strain and σ zz has its maximum value at the middle. In this case, the maximum shear stress occurs in planes normal to the plane of specimen and making 45°with the crack plane [44]. Although the variation of G I through the thickness may imply that the crack grows faster in the middle, crack front is found to remain straight during crack growth simulations which agrees with the post mortem examination of the fracture surfaces [23,25].…”
Section: Crack Frontsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Moving towards the middle, the stress state tends to plane strain and σ zz has its maximum value at the middle. In this case, the maximum shear stress occurs in planes normal to the plane of specimen and making 45°with the crack plane [44]. Although the variation of G I through the thickness may imply that the crack grows faster in the middle, crack front is found to remain straight during crack growth simulations which agrees with the post mortem examination of the fracture surfaces [23,25].…”
Section: Crack Frontsupporting
confidence: 75%