2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack growth adaptive XIGA simulation in isotropic and orthotropic materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For elements without any enriched control point, the numerical integration is conducted with (p + 1) × (q + 1) integral points, where p and q are the order of LR NURBS basis function in the ξ and η directions, respectively. For elements containing the material interface, the sub-triangle scheme [36] is used, and seven integration points are applied in each sub-triangle element.…”
Section: Xiga For Steady-state Heat Transfer In Heterogeneous Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For elements without any enriched control point, the numerical integration is conducted with (p + 1) × (q + 1) integral points, where p and q are the order of LR NURBS basis function in the ξ and η directions, respectively. For elements containing the material interface, the sub-triangle scheme [36] is used, and seven integration points are applied in each sub-triangle element.…”
Section: Xiga For Steady-state Heat Transfer In Heterogeneous Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, they presented a multi-patch isogeometric large deformation thin shell formulation based on RTH splines, and developed a stress recovery technique to drive the adaptive h-refinement procedure [33]. Recently, we proposed the adaptive LR B-splines based XIGA and successfully simulated inclusions [34], holes [35], and cracks [36][37][38]. Yang et al [39] developed an adaptive XIGA based on the PHT-splines for cracked thin plates and shells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis, semi-analysis (Wei et al, 2016), and experimental methods are limited to a few simple structural geometries and loads. Therefore, numerical methods always serve as the mainstream method for crack analysis, which include the finite element method (FEM) (Barsoum, 1976(Barsoum, , 1977, the meshfree/meshless method (Belytschko et al, 1994;Fleming et al, 1997;Rao and Rahman, 2000;Zi et al, 2007;Rabczuk et al, 2010;Zhuang et al, 2011;Zhuang et al, 2012), the extended finite element method (XFEM) (Belytschko and Black, 1999;Daux et al, 2000;Kang et al, 2017), isogeometric analysis (IGA) (De Luycker et al, 2011;Bui, 2015;Ghorashi et al, 2012;Yin et al, 2019;Gu et al, 2020), to name just a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This saves time that goes into defining the mesh and prevents geometric errors in the analysis. Further, XIGA has been extended for crack growth analysis of isotropic and orthogonal materials [50][51] and cortical bone fracture modelling [52]. However, it also requires different enrichment functions to model different material problems similar to XFEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%