1991
DOI: 10.3189/s0022143000007280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack-fabrication techniques and their effects on the fracture toughness and CTOD for fresh-water columnar ice

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The effects of notch acuity (crack-tip sharpness) on the fracture toughness of S2 ice were investigated using six groups of single-edge-notched-bend (SENB) specimens with different crack (or notch) root radii fabricated by six different methods. The mean value and standard deviations of the apparent fracturetoughness values KQ of the specimens with blunt notches were significantly higher than those of the specimens with sharp cracks. The results presented in a plot of fracture toughness versus p~, wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average fracture toughness, K Ic_ave , for pure ice in this study was 99.8 kPa m 1/2 . This value is close to those of freshwater ice obtained in previous studies at À10°C [Timco and Frederking, 1986;Nixon and Schulson, 1987;Wei et al, 1991] and serves as a validation of the procedure we used. As expected for a heterogeneous material, the values of K Ic for each silica ice vary more than the fracture toughness of pure ice, yet the data shows clearly that K Ic Figure 5.…”
Section: Peak Compressive Stresssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The average fracture toughness, K Ic_ave , for pure ice in this study was 99.8 kPa m 1/2 . This value is close to those of freshwater ice obtained in previous studies at À10°C [Timco and Frederking, 1986;Nixon and Schulson, 1987;Wei et al, 1991] and serves as a validation of the procedure we used. As expected for a heterogeneous material, the values of K Ic for each silica ice vary more than the fracture toughness of pure ice, yet the data shows clearly that K Ic Figure 5.…”
Section: Peak Compressive Stresssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, it is experientially challenging to measure fracture toughness. There exist different techniques to measure the Mode I fracture toughness of a material such as three-and four-point loaded beams with a notch, for example see Goodman and Tabor (1978), Timco and Frederking (1982), Wei et al (1991), Weber and Nixon (1996a) and Weber and Nixon (1996b) for sea water and fresh water ice. Furthermore, different parameters, which have an influence on the critical fracture toughness are analysed in Nixon and Schulson (1987), Nixon (1988) and Nixon and Schulson (1988) for tensile bars with a circulatory notch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%