2020
DOI: 10.3151/jact.18.493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack Detection from a Concrete Surface Image Based on Semantic Segmentation Using Deep Learning

Abstract: Due to their wide applicability in inspection of concrete structures, there is considerable interest in the development of automated crack detection method by image processing. However, the accuracy of existing methods tends to be influenced by the existence of traces of tie-rod holes and formworks. In order to reduce these influences, this paper proposes a crack detection method based on semantic segmentation by deep learning. The accuracy of developed method is investigated by the photos of concrete structur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-The comparison of the detection results obtained in this article with the current work is presented in Table IV. The F1 score of the proposed model is found to be 25.8% and 5.26% higher than that of LightGBM and CrackUnet-19, 45.36% higher than that of the Semantic Segmentation based algorithm proposed by Yamane et al [45], and 20.06% higher than that of the Crack Segmentation Network proposed by Lee et al [46]. It also stands at the top while comparing with FCN and CNN-based algorithm given by the Islam et al [17] and Kim et al [47] respectively.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 64%
“…-The comparison of the detection results obtained in this article with the current work is presented in Table IV. The F1 score of the proposed model is found to be 25.8% and 5.26% higher than that of LightGBM and CrackUnet-19, 45.36% higher than that of the Semantic Segmentation based algorithm proposed by Yamane et al [45], and 20.06% higher than that of the Crack Segmentation Network proposed by Lee et al [46]. It also stands at the top while comparing with FCN and CNN-based algorithm given by the Islam et al [17] and Kim et al [47] respectively.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Chun et al [48] detected cracks in concrete surfaces using a light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) considering pixel values and geometric shapes. You Only Look Once (YOLO), VGG Net, Inception Net, and Mask R-CNN have been frequently applied to detect concrete cracks in civil and infrastructure engineering studies [49].…”
Section: Cnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developments might involve the latest scanning technologies [89,90] coupled with advanced techniques [artificial neural networks, deep learning, data fusion, etc.) for interpretation of the scan results [91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98]. In this context, the recent developments such as assessment of fire damage by changes in colour [99] and improvements in ultrasound techniques [100] might be considered.…”
Section: Assessment Of Fire-ravaged Concrete Structures With Non-destmentioning
confidence: 99%