2000
DOI: 10.1002/1096-9861(20000911)425:1<70::aid-cne7>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crab stomach pyloric muscles display not only excitatory but inhibitory and neuromodulatory nerve terminals

Abstract: Movements of the foregut in crustaceans are produced by striated muscles that are innervated by motor neurons in the stomatogastric ganglion (STG). Firing of the STG motor neurons generates excitatory junctional potentials (EJPs) in the stomach muscles. We now provide evidence for the existence of separate inhibitory and neuromodulatory innervations of some pyloric muscles in the foregut of several crabs, Callinectes sapidus, Cancer magister, and Cancer borealis. Electron microscopic examination of several pyl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our observation of apparently docked DCVs in active zones contrasts with the common assertion that neuronal DCVs are rarely if ever docked at the membrane, and are excluded from active zones (De Camilli & Jahn, 1990; Verhage et al 1991; Golding, 1994; Karhunen et al 2000; but see Sharman et al 2000). The fact that single APs, short trains, or brief depolarizations often fail to release detectable amounts of peptide (Whim & Lloyd, 1989, 1994; Seward et al 1995; Vilim et al 1996; Leenders et al 1999) has often been attributed to an absence of docked vesicles ready for release.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our observation of apparently docked DCVs in active zones contrasts with the common assertion that neuronal DCVs are rarely if ever docked at the membrane, and are excluded from active zones (De Camilli & Jahn, 1990; Verhage et al 1991; Golding, 1994; Karhunen et al 2000; but see Sharman et al 2000). The fact that single APs, short trains, or brief depolarizations often fail to release detectable amounts of peptide (Whim & Lloyd, 1989, 1994; Seward et al 1995; Vilim et al 1996; Leenders et al 1999) has often been attributed to an absence of docked vesicles ready for release.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…To extrapolate a transfer function from these experiments we made the following assumptions about the muscle behavior and AGR activation: (1) as gm1 muscles are slow, non-twitch muscles and do not generate intrinsic action potentials (Jorge-Rivera and Marder, 1997), they can be approximated as a low-pass filter for the motoneuronal input (as also suggested in other systems: Partridge, 1966; Beer and Chiel, 2003). This ignores the fact that muscle dynamics can vary greatly depending on activity history and hormonal influences (Jorge-Rivera et al, 1998; Sharman et al, 2000; Birmingham and Tauck, 2003). Since we were not trying to create a realistic model of the muscle, but rather the proprioceptive response we tuned the muscle model together with the AGR model to generate the output which fit our data best (see also Discussion).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the distribution of GABA immunoreactivity in a variety of crustacean species, including lobsters, show that none of the STG motor neuron somata stain for GABA (Cournil et al, 1990;Mulloney and Hall, 1990;Swensen et al, 2000). However, GABA is found in inputs to the stomatogastric ganglion (Cournil et al, 1990;Blitz and Nusbaum, 1999), some of which project through the STG into the motor nerves (Swensen et al, 2000), and may be responsible for recent observations of inhibitory synapses onto stomach muscles (Sharman et al, 2000). Particularly relevant for this work, Sharman et al (2000) found ultrastructural evidence of inhibitory synapses onto the axons of excitatory motor neurons in crabs.…”
Section: Anatomical Evidence Consistent With the Presynaptic Periphermentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Until recently, it was thought that the muscles of the crustacean stomach receive only excitatory innervation, although a few stomach muscles show a picrotoxin-sensitive increase in Cl Ϫ conductance in response to GABA (Albert et al, 1986). New anatomical evidence has suggested that there may be GABAergic innervation to some of the crustacean stomach muscles (Sharman et al, 2000;Swensen et al, 2000). This prompted us to reinvestigate the possible role of GABA at some of the neuromuscular junctions of the lobster Homarus americanus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%