2009 35th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications 2009
DOI: 10.1109/seaa.2009.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CQML Scheme: A Classification Scheme for Comprehensive Quality Model Landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, quality models can serve different application purposes, such as specifying, measuring, assessing, improving, managing and predicting quality [6]. While this article focus on the benefits of the DQM for assessing and improving design, the discussion of applying DQM to two software products strengthens our confidence that it contributes to a better understanding and characterization of design principles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, quality models can serve different application purposes, such as specifying, measuring, assessing, improving, managing and predicting quality [6]. While this article focus on the benefits of the DQM for assessing and improving design, the discussion of applying DQM to two software products strengthens our confidence that it contributes to a better understanding and characterization of design principles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kläs et al argue the importance of classifying quality models to support quality managers in selecting and adapting quality models that are relevant for them [6]. For a classification, the authors differ between the underlying conceptual constructs of quality models as result of their specific application and measuring purposes.…”
Section: Introduction and Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scheme presented in Kläs et al (2009) Based on the work in Kläs et al (2009), the following subsections give further insights into what structural components of models look like (dimension a), discuss the specification of quality modeling goals (dimension b), and describe quality model landscapes as a means for systematically selecting suitable models (based on dimensions a-f). Figure 6.3 depicts a graphical illustration of typical structural components of quality models.…”
Section: Selecting the Right Quality Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, making no assumptions about the underlying structure of the QMs that should be adapted would avoid the operationalization of the adaptation method; therefore, we assume that the adapted QM should conform to the structure and consistency rules defined by the Quamoco quality meta-model [19]. This meta-model was developed in a joint effort by academic and industrial partners in a publicly funded project and addresses all conceptual elements recommended in [18] for specifying and assessing software quality. Recent empirical evaluations have shown that the meta-model is general enough to describe many different QMs applied in practice [19] and specific enough to define QMs that can be used for valid product quality evaluations [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%