Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Surfactant rescue therapy can be utilized effectively early in the course of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in infants weighing > 1,000 g and treated exclusively with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Thirteen infants (BW, 1,774 +/- 580 g; GA, 31 +/- 3 weeks) comprising the CPAP/SURFACTANT group were compared with 12 infants (BW, 1,753 +/- 556 g; GA, 31 +/- 2 weeks) who comprised the intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV)/surfactant group, and with 14 infants (BW, 1,776 +/- 332 g; GA, 32 +/- 2 weeks) treated with CPAP before surfactant was clinically available. A 5 mL/kg dose of Exosurf Neonatal (Burroughs-Wellcome) was administered to infants intratracheally when the FiO2 requirement reached 0.40 to maintain the PO2 above 50 torr. Infants in the CPAP/surfactant group were intubated solely for surfactant administration and extubated within 18 +/- 6 min of treatment. The CPAP/surfactant group was treated at a mean age of 12.3 +/- 9.3 h, and the IMV/surfactant group at 10.2 +/- 9.8 h. Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (AaDO2), oxygenation index (OI), and mean airway pressure (MAP) were determined immediately before and after surfactant therapy, and at comparable times for the CPAP-only group. A significant difference was found in pre-treatment AaDO2, OI and MAP between the CPAP/surfactant group and IMV/surfactant group, but not between the CPAP/surfactant group and the CPAP-only group. Similarly, a significant difference in AaDO2, OI and MAP continued post-treatment was noted. However, a significant difference was also found at this time between the CPAP/surfactant group and the CPAP-only group. In addition, a significant difference was noted in AaDO2 and OI pre- and post-treatment within each surfactant-treated group. Furthermore, in the CPAP-only group AaDO2 and OI actually worsened (212 +/- 70 vs. 239 +/- 68; 4.0 +/- 1 vs. 4.5 +/- 2, respectively). There was a significant reduction in the duration of oxygen therapy (3 +/- 2 vs. 5 +/- 2 vs. 4.5 +/- 2 days, respectively) as well as in the total days of hospitalization (30 +/- 10 vs. 42 +/- 15 vs. 43 +/- 12 days, respectively). We conclude that in this small group of infants surfactant administration was effective and safe. It appeared to improve the course of RDS and shorten the duration of oxygen exposure and days of hospitalization.
Surfactant rescue therapy can be utilized effectively early in the course of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in infants weighing > 1,000 g and treated exclusively with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Thirteen infants (BW, 1,774 +/- 580 g; GA, 31 +/- 3 weeks) comprising the CPAP/SURFACTANT group were compared with 12 infants (BW, 1,753 +/- 556 g; GA, 31 +/- 2 weeks) who comprised the intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV)/surfactant group, and with 14 infants (BW, 1,776 +/- 332 g; GA, 32 +/- 2 weeks) treated with CPAP before surfactant was clinically available. A 5 mL/kg dose of Exosurf Neonatal (Burroughs-Wellcome) was administered to infants intratracheally when the FiO2 requirement reached 0.40 to maintain the PO2 above 50 torr. Infants in the CPAP/surfactant group were intubated solely for surfactant administration and extubated within 18 +/- 6 min of treatment. The CPAP/surfactant group was treated at a mean age of 12.3 +/- 9.3 h, and the IMV/surfactant group at 10.2 +/- 9.8 h. Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (AaDO2), oxygenation index (OI), and mean airway pressure (MAP) were determined immediately before and after surfactant therapy, and at comparable times for the CPAP-only group. A significant difference was found in pre-treatment AaDO2, OI and MAP between the CPAP/surfactant group and IMV/surfactant group, but not between the CPAP/surfactant group and the CPAP-only group. Similarly, a significant difference in AaDO2, OI and MAP continued post-treatment was noted. However, a significant difference was also found at this time between the CPAP/surfactant group and the CPAP-only group. In addition, a significant difference was noted in AaDO2 and OI pre- and post-treatment within each surfactant-treated group. Furthermore, in the CPAP-only group AaDO2 and OI actually worsened (212 +/- 70 vs. 239 +/- 68; 4.0 +/- 1 vs. 4.5 +/- 2, respectively). There was a significant reduction in the duration of oxygen therapy (3 +/- 2 vs. 5 +/- 2 vs. 4.5 +/- 2 days, respectively) as well as in the total days of hospitalization (30 +/- 10 vs. 42 +/- 15 vs. 43 +/- 12 days, respectively). We conclude that in this small group of infants surfactant administration was effective and safe. It appeared to improve the course of RDS and shorten the duration of oxygen exposure and days of hospitalization.
Continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) has been applied with a face-chamber in 74 infants with hyaline membrane disease (HMD) before 10 h of age. The total survival rate was 91% and the complication rate of pneumothorax was low (5%). The incidence of long term developmental and neurological sequelae was also low (4%). Among the 19 surviving very low birth-weight (VLBW) infants below 1501 g, only one has shown neurological sequelae at follow-up examinations after 18 months to 3 years of age. The incidence of cerebellar hemorrhage was not higher in infants treated with the CPAP face chamber than in infants not receiving assisted ventilation. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia did not occur in any infant treated with CPAP face chamber only. The main advantages with the face chamber technique are: no disturbance of glottis function, no mucosal damage and tube obstruction, or sudden pressure drops, as seen with other modes of CPAP application. The face chamber technique is suitable for early application of CPAP in infants with HMD as it is efficient, without hazards, and easily applied.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.