2020
DOI: 10.1163/1568539x-bja10002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coyotes living near cities are bolder: implications for dog evolution and human-wildlife conflict

Abstract: How animal populations adapt to human modified landscapes is central to understanding modern behavioural evolution and improving wildlife management. Coyotes (Canis latrans) have adapted to human activities and thrive in both rural and urban areas. Bolder coyotes showing reduced fear of humans and their artefacts may have an advantage in urban environments. We analysed the reactions of 636 coyotes to novel human artefacts (camera traps) at 575 sites across the state of North Carolina. Likelihood of a coyote ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together, these results support the idea that, as human foragers became more sedentary, a population(s) of wolves was selected for an attraction to humans (and their food waste 44 ). Before this selection, any human-wolf interaction was constrained by the flight response of wolves.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Together, these results support the idea that, as human foragers became more sedentary, a population(s) of wolves was selected for an attraction to humans (and their food waste 44 ). Before this selection, any human-wolf interaction was constrained by the flight response of wolves.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…At the same time, cities and towns have expanded into coyotes' original habitat (Hody & Kays, 2018). Coyotes adapting to urban areas in the east coast have been proposed as a candidate species to test predictions of the selfdomestication hypothesis and dog evolution (Brooks et al, 2020).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these theories require a comprehensive and collaborative program of research that tests animals from a variety of social and physical environments (MacLean et al, 2012; Vonk et al, 2020). More recently, comparative psychologists have examined how humans have artificially selected for particular physical and behavioral traits and their relevance to cognition (in dogs, e.g., Hare et al, 2002), and how anthropogenic influences may have inadvertently impacted the evolution of other species, such as tree swallows (Injaian et al, 2018), red-winged blackbirds (Ríos-Chelén et al, 2015), coyotes (Brooks et al, 2020), and other large mammals (Yackulic et al, 2011). These shifts from “what” to “how” and “why” questions have opened the field to embrace the study of all species.…”
Section: Meaningless Debatesmentioning
confidence: 99%