2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) legume grains as protein source in the ration of growing sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
13
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it can be assumed that cull pinto bean ruminal degradation of the proteic fraction and RDP percentage are similar to those presented by the ingredients that were substituted by CPB. Similar results were presented by Singh et al (2006), when cowpea grains were used in the diet of lambs. They found that the inclusion of this ingredient does not affect ruminal ammonia concentration; nonetheless, the results in this experiment are greater (0.281 kg kg -1 ) than those presented by those authors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, it can be assumed that cull pinto bean ruminal degradation of the proteic fraction and RDP percentage are similar to those presented by the ingredients that were substituted by CPB. Similar results were presented by Singh et al (2006), when cowpea grains were used in the diet of lambs. They found that the inclusion of this ingredient does not affect ruminal ammonia concentration; nonetheless, the results in this experiment are greater (0.281 kg kg -1 ) than those presented by those authors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Castillo et al (2011) demonstrated that mature ewes can tolerate higher levels of CPB than primiparous (averaging 11 months old), which developed diarrhea when 0.50 kg kg -1 of CPB was included in their supplement, while multiparous ewes (averaging 36 months old) did not develop this metabolic disorder. Other studies have reported similar results when different legume grains were fed to ruminants (Surra et al, 1992;Singh et al, 2006;Gilbery et al, 2007). Patterson et al (1999) found that the inclusion of cull beans in the diets of steers decreased NDF degradability; these results are in contrast with those reported in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…El análisis de varianza para el contenido nutricional arrojó diferencia altamente significativa (p ≤ 0,01) para la variable porcentaje de proteína (Cuadro 2), lo que obedece a las diferencias genéticas entre los cultivares, en el peso molecular de las proteínas (Oppong-Konadu et al, 2005) y método de procedimiento (Wang y Daun, 2004;Singh et al, 2006). El rango de porcentaje de proteína fluctuó entre 22,06%±0,82 para L038 y 26,90%±1,76 para LCPM35, con una media de 24,76% (Cuadro 2), lo que supera los valores reportados por Vargas et al (2012) y Frota et al (2008.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…El rango de porcentaje de proteína fluctuó entre 22,06%±0,82 para L038 y 26,90%±1,76 para LCPM35, con una media de 24,76% (Cuadro 2), lo que supera los valores reportados por Vargas et al (2012) y Frota et al (2008. Y se encuentran en el rango reportado por Singh et al (2006); Vasconcelos et al (2010) y Carvalho et al (2012, en cultivares de frijol caupí y un coeficiente de variación de 5,70%, por lo que, la precisión experimental es buena y confiable, ya que, el coeficiente de variación resultó inferior al 16% (Hortwitz, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified