Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship

Bouncken, Ricarda B.; Reuschl, Andreas J.

doi:10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y

Cited by 311 publications

(277 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

256

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…В таких условиях предпринимательская производительность заметно улучшается благодаря процессам обучения среди коворкинг-пользователей (Bouncken and Reuschl, 2018). Для описания схожих явлений в области финансов используют термин «ячеистая экономика» (mesh economy) (Turi, Domingo-Ferrer and Sánchez, 2017), представляющую новую концепцию взаимовыгодных взаимодействий между агентами, предлагая инструменты для развития доверия в сообществе с тем, чтобы сделать его более кооперированным.…”

unclassified

Innovations in The Institutional Modelling of The Sharing Economy

Попов¹,

Hercegová²,

Semyachkov³

2018

JIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

unclassified

Innovations in The Institutional Modelling of The Sharing Economy

Попов¹,

Hercegová²,

Semyachkov³

2018

JIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The ability to work from anywhere-the epitome of the modern conception of flexibility-actually puts an onus on a worker to construct or find a physical situation that will be effective for professional productivity. The popular rise of coworking spaces (Bouncken and Reuschl 2016;Garrett et al 2017;Leclercq-Vandelannoitte and Isaac 2016;Spinuzzi 2012) highlights workers' desires to leverage non-traditional, yet socially sanctioned, workspaces that, among other things, allow them to shore up the spatio-temporal boundaries of their professional lives.…”

Section: From Flexible Time To Flexible Workermentioning

confidence: 99%

Flexible Turtles and Elastic Octopi: Exploring Agile Practice in Knowledge Work

Erickson

Menezes

Raheja

et al. 2019

Comput Supported Coop Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper takes as its starting place the rich context of many knowledge workers today-highly distributed, increasing project focused, typically atypical days, infrastructural-and attempts to push past extant descriptions of their practices as 'flexible'. Using empirical data informed by a practice theory lens, we expand the understanding of flexibility with regard to work by augmenting how worker disposition, as well as the ability to engage with agility in dynamic circumstances, should be considered as a factor when examining and designing for this population. We make several contributions of interest to the wider CSCW community. First, we distinguish between those who showcase flexible practices and those who proactively orient around flexibility. We call this second group 'elastic workers'. Second, we raise new questions for us as scholars and designers keen to exploit the conceptual and pragmatic intersection of technology and work. These questions create opportunities to explore different methods for understanding complex phenomena such as flexibility, as well as understanding how we might design for this phenomenon with more foresight in the future.

show abstract

“…At a basic level, SWS are typically office and light industrial spaces where individuals work together with different degrees of independence, whereas co-working spaces additionally seek to enable the creation of deeper community ties (Spinuzzi 2012). Independent workers are able to work adjacently, enjoy incidental social encounters, collaborate with fellow co-workers, and build and transfer knowledge by making employment and business connections (Spinuzzi 2012;Gerdenitsch et al 2016;Bouncken and Reuschl 2016). Conclusions about the real and potential impacts of this growth in SWS are mixed.…”

Section: The Shared Economy and Implications For Working Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

The Rise of Shared Work Spaces: A Disruption to Urban Planning Policy?

Babb

Curtis

McLeod

2018

Urban Policy and Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New models of shared work spaces have the potential to disrupt traditional employment spaces. The full implications of these new employment spaces for urban policy and planning are unclear.Drawing on a pilot study of Greater Perth and regional Western Australia, current planning policies that facilitate, or create barriers to, the success of shared work spaces are examined. Interviews with a sample of managers and users of shared work spaces are reported.Shared work spaces are emerging in regulatory voids left by outdated policy frameworks. They escape adverse policy settings by relying on the forward thinking of local regulators seeking to revitalise urban centres. The success of innovative repurposing of space brings into question the efficacy and purpose of more prescriptive land use regulations and policies.

show abstract

Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship

Cited by 311 publications

References 54 publications

Innovations in The Institutional Modelling of The Sharing Economy

Innovations in The Institutional Modelling of The Sharing Economy

Flexible Turtles and Elastic Octopi: Exploring Agile Practice in Knowledge Work

The Rise of Shared Work Spaces: A Disruption to Urban Planning Policy?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About