Coworker Influence Upon Individual Internalization of Safety

Abstract

What is the influence of coworkers upon the individual's internalization of safety? Despite it being recognized as one of the most pervasive determinants of individual behaviour, social influence upon individual safety motivation has largely been overlooked by safety studies. This study operationalized group level safety climate to focus on coworker influence -an alternative to the predominant group level leadership perspective.This exploratory, qualitative study interviewed 55 workers across three safety critical industries: firefighting, whitewater raft guiding, and paramedicine. The interviews were combined with workplace visits and six group interviews, using a theoretical proposition guided research model. The semi-structured qualitative approach allowed for the nature of the unstudied relationship between coworker influence and individual safety values to emerge. The focus of the study was at the individual level.This study found that there is significant complexity at the coworker level regarding safety; more so than the predominant hierarchical safety climate paradigm. The major theoretical contribution of this research is a finding that coworker influence and social identity were an active influence upon internalizing safety motivation. Shared experience, social bonding and trust allowed for the individual to socially identify with their group and internalize group safety priorities and incorporate these into self-concept. Coworker social support and trust validated the individuals' sense of competency. This sense of competency was the first defense in dealing with work ambiguity, but more existentially, coworker endorsement of competency also anchored basic work identity. Safety at its most concrete level was about not getting hurt. Safety at its more meaningful level was about the potential harm from finding one's self on the outside of the work group and the internal or psychological implications of such exposure.This research adds complexity to the field of safety studies by including peer interaction and internal safety values. This research also introduces to safety studies as-yet underutilized social theories as a means of examining coworker influence and internalizing safety. In particular, self-determination theory and social identification theory are applied to group and individual level safety behaviour.iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my Supervisor, Dr. Steven Murphy, for his work in seeing this project through. He seemed to know just the right questions to ask.

Preconditions for nurses' perceived organizational support in healthcare: a qualitative explorative study

“…This aligns well with results from a study in safety-critical industries, which suggested that social support and trust from co-workers validated the individuals' sense of competency. This sense of competency was the first defence in dealing with work ambiguity, but it also anchored basic work identity ( Jackson, 2017 ). It is also in concordance with previous studies in healthcare, indicating the importance of good relations within and between professions to attain staff health and safety, and patient safety ( Eklöf et al , 2014 ), as well as general quality developments in healthcare settings ( Gadolin and Andersson, 2017 ; Gadolin, 2018 ).…”

The impact of psychosocial working conditions on information security behaviour in the nuclear industry

“…In a qualitative study, Gyllensten and Törner (2021) found that peer discussions on how rules should be situationally interpreted and implemented were important to develop a common interpretation of complex rules. Further, Jackson (2017) stated that social support from and trustful relations with co-workers validated the individual’s sense of competence and that such a sense of competence was a first defence in handling competing demands.…”

The role of organizational and social factors for information security in a nuclear power industry

“…In safety culture and climate research, the importance of managers' unrebutted priority of safety is wellestablished (Christian et al, 2009;Beus et al, 2010). Organizational cultures, and thus safety and security cultures, also comprise social norms among co-workers, and Jackson (2017) found that co-worker social support and trust was important for individuals to internalize group safety priorities and validate the individual's sense of competency. This sense of competency was important in dealing with work ambiguity.…”