Children 2 Oral food challenges (OFCs) are the recommended procedure to document the resolution of food allergy, 3,4 but they are time-consuming, difficult to perform, require resources, and expose the patient to the risk of a significant allergic reaction. Food-specific IgE (FSIgE) levels have been used to predict the outcome of OFC because FSIgE levels above certain cut points were found to be highly predictive of positive OFCs.5-10 However, FSIgE levels are less effective in identifying children who experience a negative OFC.
11In clinical practice, children with a known food allergy are considered appropriate candidates for OFCs to evaluate for resolution of food allergy when the likelihood of a positive OFC is Յ50%.3 Previous research 11 has revealed that FSIgE of Յ2 kUa/L (or Յ5 kUa/L for peanuts without a history of previous reaction) are associated with an estimated Յ50% likelihood of reacting to eggs, milk, or peanuts during an OFC, and these FSIgE values have been incorporated into clinical guidelines.11 Identifying additional clinical and laboratory factors associated with negative OFC within this group of patients would improve patient care by decreasing the number of unnecessary (i.e., predictably positive) OFCs.Recently, it was shown that the incorporation of clinical and laboratory data to supplement FSIgE levels effectively diagnosed food allergy and might eliminate the need for some OFCs to confirm the presence of food allergy. 12,13 We extended this approach to the clinical scenario aimed at increasing the accuracy of identifying children who will experience negative OFCs. We aimed to investigate if there are food-specific combinations of clinical and laboratory characteristics that define subgroups of children, undergoing OFC based on the guideline-recommended FSIgE levels, 3 who are most likely to experience a negative OFC.