Covidence vs Excel for the title and abstract review stage of a systematic review

MacDonald, Matthew Elliott; Misener, R. Martin; Weeks, Linda; Helwig, Michael

doi:10.1097/01.xeb.0000511346.12446.f2

Cited by 22 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All studies were imported into Covidence software [ 24 ] to manage documents and guide the inclusion/exclusion and voting procedures of the umbrella review. Covidence facilitates review studies with multiple researchers, manages criteria and inclusion/exclusion choices throughout review stages, maintains confidentiality between researchers when reviewing studies, and provides researchers with an audit trail of decisions and outcomes [ 25 ]. Specific eligibility criteria were established utilizing a PICOS modified statement (see Table 2 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nature’s Role in Outdoor Therapies: An Umbrella Review

Harper

Fernee

Gabrielsen

2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To report on the role of nature in outdoor therapies through review and summary of existing systematic and meta-analytic reviews in an effort to articulate a theoretical framework for practice. Materials and methods: An umbrella review was conducted following systematic protocols PRISMA guidelines. Results: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and represented five self-identified approaches: nature-based therapies, forest therapy, horticultural therapy, wilderness therapy, and adventure therapy. Clear and comprehensive descriptions of theory, program structure, and activity details with causal links to outcomes were mostly absent. Conclusions: A rigorous and determined program of research is required in order to explicit in-depth theories of change in outdoor therapies. Conversely, or maybe concurrently, a holistic theory of integrated relatedness may be developed as a parallel expression of support for nature in therapy while the explanatory science catches up.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nature’s Role in Outdoor Therapies: An Umbrella Review

Harper

Fernee

Gabrielsen

2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Disagreements between the two reviewers were discussed, and consensus was achieved. The Covidence software (Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia; http://www.covidence.org) was used as screening tool .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multifaceted Pharmacist‐led Interventions in the Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review

Skjøt‐Arkil

Lundby

Kjeldsen³

et al. 2018

Basic Clin Pharma Tox

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clinical pharmacy services often comprise complex interventions. In this MiniReview, we conducted a systematic review aiming to evaluate the impact of multifaceted pharmacist-led interventions in a hospital setting. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and CINAHL for peer-reviewed articles published from 2006 to 1 March 2018. Controlled trials concerning hospitalized patients in any setting receiving patient-related multifaceted pharmacist-led interventions were considered. All types of outcome were accepted. Inclusion and data extraction were performed. Study characteristics were collected, and risk of bias assessment was conducted utilizing the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. All stages were conducted by at least two independent reviewers. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017075808). A total of 11,896 publications were identified, and 28 publications were included. Of these, 17 were conducted in Europe. Six of the included publications were multi-centre studies, and 16 were randomized trials. Usual care was the comparator. Significant results on quality of medication use were reported as positive in eleven studies (n = 18; 61%) and negative in one (n = 18, 6%). Hospital visits were reduced significantly in seven studies (n = 16; 44%). Four studies (n = 12; 33%) reported a positive significant effect on either length of stay or time to revisit, and one study reported a negative effect (n = 12; 6%). All studies investigating mortality (n = 6), patient-reported outcome (n = 7) and cost-effectiveness (n = 1) showed no significant results. This MiniReview indicates that multifaceted pharmacist-led interventions in a hospital setting may improve the quality of medication use and reduce hospital visits and length of stay, while no effect was seen on mortality, patient-reported outcome and cost-effectiveness.

show abstract

“…Results retrieved from Scopus were sorted using the sorting option "times cited-highest to lowest." Scopus outputs were then exported to Covidence, an electronic primary screening and data extraction tool, which has been recommended as best practice in rigorous review methodology data charting [35][36][37]. Duplicates were removed.…”

Section: Search Strategy and Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psycho-Oncology: A Bibliometric Review of the 100 Most-Cited Articles

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: A bibliometric review of psycho-oncology research is overdue. (2) Methods: The 100 most-cited journal articles were compiled and ranked according to Scopus. (3) Results: The total citation count for the results ranged from 488–8509 (Mean = 940.27; SD = 1015.69). A significant correlation was found between years since publication and number of citations (p = 0.039). The majority of research originated from the United States (66%). The vast majority of research publications were original articles (80%). Observational research study designs represented the majority of studies (37%). Mixed cancer population research studies represented the largest cancer research population (36%). Positive psychology topics represented the most prolific proportion of studies (30%). Findings were reported in line with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. (4) Conclusions: This analysis offers a comprehensive account of seminal journal articles in psycho-oncology, identifying landmark contributions and areas for future research developments within the field, namely highlighting a need for more RCT studies. This analysis serves as an educational tool for interdisciplinary researchers and clinicians to support compassionate cancer care.

show abstract

Covidence vs Excel for the title and abstract review stage of a systematic review

Cited by 22 publications

References 0 publications

Nature’s Role in Outdoor Therapies: An Umbrella Review

Nature’s Role in Outdoor Therapies: An Umbrella Review

Multifaceted Pharmacist‐led Interventions in the Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review

Psycho-Oncology: A Bibliometric Review of the 100 Most-Cited Articles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About