2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11879-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID19-related and all-cause mortality risk among middle-aged and older adults across the first epidemic wave of SARS-COV-2 infection: a population-based cohort study in Southern Catalonia, Spain, March–June 2020

Abstract: Background Direct and indirect COVID19-related mortality is uncertain. This study investigated all-cause and COVID19-related deaths among middle-aged and older adults during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic period, assessing mortality risks by pre-existing socio-demographic and medical underlying conditions. Methods Population-based cohort study involving 79,083 individuals ≥50 years-old in Tarragona (Southern Catalonia, Spain). Baseline cohort … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…57 To estimate CPR cancer underdiagnosis, excess deaths that occurred in the pandemic were taken into account. 2 , 58 , 59 Expected incident cancers (E) in the CPR during the pandemic were estimated by applying 2019 cancer incidence specific rates by sex and 5-year age groups to the updated 2020 and 2021 Catalan population pyramids for each tumor site. 60 CPR incident cancers during the pandemic were considered observed cancers (O).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 To estimate CPR cancer underdiagnosis, excess deaths that occurred in the pandemic were taken into account. 2 , 58 , 59 Expected incident cancers (E) in the CPR during the pandemic were estimated by applying 2019 cancer incidence specific rates by sex and 5-year age groups to the updated 2020 and 2021 Catalan population pyramids for each tumor site. 60 CPR incident cancers during the pandemic were considered observed cancers (O).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 In 11 studies, ratio measures were close to 1. 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 In 2 studies, an increased risk was observed. 58 , 59 Most of these studies were conducted in hospitalized patients and/or patients tested for COVID‐19.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a preliminary review and the elimination of duplicates, 5328 papers were screened and chosen for further evaluation. A total of 58 studies (Adejumo et al 2021 ; Akhtar et al 2021 ; Alpert et al 2021 ; Arslan et al 2021 ; Azarkar et al 2021 ; Baker et al 2021 ; Benelli et al 2020 ; Bennett et al 2021 ; Bergman et al 2021 ; Bernard et al 2021 ; Bhargava et al 2021 ; Borobia et al 2020 ; Pinto et al 2020 ; Chai et al 2021 ; Fu et al 2021 ; Chudasama et al 2021 ; Costa et al 2021 ; Duanmu et al 2020 ; Gold et al 2020 ; Görgülü et al 2020 ; Goyal et al 2020 ; Gude-Sampedro et al 2021 ; Guo et al 2021 ; Joharatnam-Hogan et al 2020 ; Katkat et al 2021 ; Kim et al 2021 ; Kokturk et al 2021 ; Liang et al 2021 ; Sun et al 2021 ; Cavanna et al 2020 ; Lunski et al 2021 ; Martinot et al 2021 ; Mirgh et al 2021 ; Miyashita et al 2020 ; Nakamura et al 2021 ; Nikpouraghdam et al 2020 ; Panda et al 2022 ; Péron et al 2021 ; Poli et al 2022 ; Li et al 2020a , b ; Reddy et al 2021 ; Regina et al 2020 ; Ricoca-Peixoto et al 2020 ; Giorgi-Rossi et al 2020 ; Rugge et al 2020 ; Erdal et al 2021 ; Sami et al 2020 ; Santorelli et al 2021 ; Pérez-Segura et al 2021 ; Serraino et al 2021 ; Shahidsales et al 2021 ; Sorouri et al 2020 ; Stroppa et al 2020 ; Tehrani et al 2021 ; Vergara et al 2021 ; Vila-Corcoles et al 20...…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A total of 42 studies (Akhtar et al 2021 ; Alpert et al 2021 ; Arslan et al 2021 ; Azarkar et al 2021 ; Baker et al 2021 ; Benelli et al 2020 ; Bennett et al 2021 ; Bernard et al 2021 ; Bhargava et al 2021 ; Borobia et al 2020 ; Pinto et al 2020 ; Chai et al 2021 ; Fu et al 2021 ; Gude-Sampedro et al 2021 ; Guo et al 2021 ; Joharatnam-Hogan et al 2020 ; Katkat et al 2021 ; Kim et al 2021 ; Kokturk et al 2021 ; Liang et al 2021 ; Sun et al 2021 ; Lunski et al 2021 ; Martinot et al 2021 ; Mirgh et al 2021 ; Miyashita et al 2020 ; Péron et al 2021 ; Poli et al 2022 ; Li et al 2020a , b ; Reddy et al 2021 ; Ricoca Peixoto et al 2020 ; Giorgi-Rossi et al 2020; Rugge et al 2020 ; Erdal et al 2021 ; Pérez-Segura et al 2021 ; Serraino et al 2021 ; Shahidsales et al 2021 ; Sorouri et al 2020 ; Stroppa et al 2020 ; Vergara et al 2021 ; Vila-Corcoles et al 2021 ; Zhang et al 2021 ; Zhou et al 2021 ) were included in the analysis to compare the mortality rates of cancer and non-cancer patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. There were a total of 557,053 participants, of whom 21,599 were cancer patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%