COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and patient self-advocacy: a statistical analysis of those who can and can’t get vaccinated

Abstract

Background This study applies the Patient Self-Advocacy scale to investigate vaccine hesitancy in New Zealand. Due to New Zealand’s very limited tertiary hospital system and vulnerable populations, the Government’s strategy to address COVID-19 has been to prevent the virus from entering the nation and to eliminate it when it does cross the border. Therefore, there is no opportunity for the nation to generate any acquired immunity through exposure. To transition from closed borders, New Zealand will need to run a highly successful national vaccination programme and this needs to have the ability to drive influential public health messaging to the targeted places within the communities where vaccine hesitancy most exists. Methods This study employed statistical methods. A nationally representative survey of adults in New Zealand (n = 1852) was collected via Qualtrics. Independent samples t-tests, and multiple regression were used to explore the research questions. Results Those who identify as medically able to be vaccinated expressed significantly higher confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine than those who identified as unable to be vaccinated. Patient-self advocacy had a positive effect on vaccine confidence. Individuals who identify as able to be vaccinated have less hesitancy. Demographics had various effects on vaccine hesitancy. Conclusion The research highlights particularly important insights into vaccine hesitancy related to patient self-advocacy behaviours, and various demographic variables such as political affiliation. In addition, the research adds further clarity on how and why New Zealanders have responded to the COVID-vaccine. Finally, the importance of vaccine literacy is discussed.

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Patients Recovered From COVID-19 Infection in Wuhan, China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

“…Additionally, the belief that vaccination of those around them is sufficient to prevent transmission and protect themselves from COVID-19 reinfection could result in a lower perception of COVID-19 reinfection risk among COVID-19–recovered patients. According to our study, among the reasons why COVID-19 survivors were willing to be vaccinated, most participants chose “self-needs,” which could eventually lead to high vaccine uptake [ 66 ]. By reducing their beliefs about complacency, this group of COVID-19 survivors might realize that vaccination is necessary for them.…”

COVID-19 Vaccine Communication Campaigns: A Cross-Country Analysis Based on Hofstede Cultural Dimensions

“…The vaccine was distributed all over the world and administered by the different health organizations despite doubts and limitations. Even if the vaccine is testified and licensed by WHO to cure COVID-19, people have different understandings and hesitancy (Ashwell, Cullinane, & Croucher, 2022). This is why, to build trust and avoid vaccine hesitancy, effective communication is necessary for the correct implementation of the vaccine policy (Yemer, Desta, & Workie, 2021).…”

Analysis of the opinions of individuals on the COVID-19 vaccination on social media

“… 7 , 8 Therefore, it was only normal for people to be sceptical of the COVID-19 immunisations that were being provided to them. 9 People questioned the effectiveness of vaccinations as well as whether appropriate safety measures were taken during the manufacture of vaccines. 10 – 12 The public is hesitant to participate due to a variety of causes, including uncertainty, problems in registering or scheduling, fear of potentially unfavourable outcomes, and other considerations.…”