Abstract:Background
Since the successful development of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) vaccine, COVID-19 vaccination has been actively advocated all over the world. As the key population for COVID-19 vaccination, the acceptance of Healthcare Workers (HCWs) is not only related to their risk of contracting COVID-19 infection at work, but also affects the decision of the general population on COVID-19 vaccination. Currently, a series of observational studies have been conducted on the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines among… Show more
“…Our rate of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among HCWs (35.9%) is comparable to reports from other parts of Nigeria (33.3%) [ 14 ], but lower than findings by others (64.6%) [ 45 ]. Our uptake is also lower than rates in Asia (67.2–76.98%) [ 10 , 15 ], Europe (76.9%) [ 6 ], and the US (50–96%) [ 46 ]. Possible explanations for these variations include disparities in study population, timeframe, methods and measurement, vaccine knowledge, vaccine confidence, safety, risk perception and the enforcement of mandates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Furthermore, among members of the public, the figures varied from 40% across Africa to 73% in Australia [ 12 , 13 ]. COVID-19 vaccine uptake among HCWs also varies from 33% in Nigeria [ 14 ] to 77% in France [ 6 ] and 78% in China [ 15 ].…”
This study examined the support for vaccine mandates and uptake among clinical and non-clinical staff at a tertiary hospital in northern Nigeria, focusing on variation of survey responses based on job position, socio-demographic characteristics, and perceived risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Using an explanatory, sequential, mixed-methods design and deploying a pragmatic paradigm, 370 healthcare workers were administered structured questionnaires. This was followed by in-depth interviews with a sub-sample of respondents to further clarify the responses regarding support for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine mandate. Findings demonstrated that less than one-half of respondents supported the COVID-19 mandate, and only one in three had received the recommended COVID-19 vaccine doses. Support for the vaccine mandate and vaccine uptake were predicted by profession, work experience, number of children, health status, and risk perception. Support for the vaccine mandate was ascribed to ethical and professional duty, whereas opposition was associated with respect for autonomy and human rights. This study documents the need to enhance support for vaccine mandates and uptake among healthcare workers through sustainable strategies, as Nigeria’s healthcare workers are considered a source of trust and role models for the rest of society.
“…Our rate of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among HCWs (35.9%) is comparable to reports from other parts of Nigeria (33.3%) [ 14 ], but lower than findings by others (64.6%) [ 45 ]. Our uptake is also lower than rates in Asia (67.2–76.98%) [ 10 , 15 ], Europe (76.9%) [ 6 ], and the US (50–96%) [ 46 ]. Possible explanations for these variations include disparities in study population, timeframe, methods and measurement, vaccine knowledge, vaccine confidence, safety, risk perception and the enforcement of mandates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Furthermore, among members of the public, the figures varied from 40% across Africa to 73% in Australia [ 12 , 13 ]. COVID-19 vaccine uptake among HCWs also varies from 33% in Nigeria [ 14 ] to 77% in France [ 6 ] and 78% in China [ 15 ].…”
This study examined the support for vaccine mandates and uptake among clinical and non-clinical staff at a tertiary hospital in northern Nigeria, focusing on variation of survey responses based on job position, socio-demographic characteristics, and perceived risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Using an explanatory, sequential, mixed-methods design and deploying a pragmatic paradigm, 370 healthcare workers were administered structured questionnaires. This was followed by in-depth interviews with a sub-sample of respondents to further clarify the responses regarding support for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine mandate. Findings demonstrated that less than one-half of respondents supported the COVID-19 mandate, and only one in three had received the recommended COVID-19 vaccine doses. Support for the vaccine mandate and vaccine uptake were predicted by profession, work experience, number of children, health status, and risk perception. Support for the vaccine mandate was ascribed to ethical and professional duty, whereas opposition was associated with respect for autonomy and human rights. This study documents the need to enhance support for vaccine mandates and uptake among healthcare workers through sustainable strategies, as Nigeria’s healthcare workers are considered a source of trust and role models for the rest of society.
“…COVID-19 vaccination of healthcare workers is important both for protection of the individuals from SARS-CoV-2 and as an infection control practice to reduce nosocomial transmission of the virus since a significant proportion of COVID-19 inpatients acquire their infection in hospital [ 19 , 20 ]. A great number of studies have already investigated the intention of HCWs to accept a COVID-19 vaccine, finding low pooled acceptance rates: 63.5% in a meta-analysis with 50,940 HCWs worldwide [ 21 ] and 78% in a meta-analysis with 45,760 HCWs in China [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigated intention of HCWs to accept a COVID-19 vaccine [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Evidence shows that the main predictors for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among HCWs are male gender, older age, and previous influenza vaccination.…”
The vaccine-induced immunity of healthcare workers (HCWs) is crucial to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the COVID-19 vaccine uptake among HCWs worldwide and to identify predictors of vaccination. We searched Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, PubMed, ProQuest, CINAHL, and medRxiv up to 25 August 2022. We applied the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We found 25 studies including 491,624 vaccinated HCWs, while the full sample included 555,561 HCWs. The overall proportion of vaccinated HCWs was 77.3%. Vaccine uptake for studies that were conducted in North America (85.6%) was higher than the proportion for studies that were conducted in Asia (79.5%), Europe (72.8%), and Africa (65.6%). The overall prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine uptake was 83.6% and 77.4% for physicians and nurses, respectively. Older age, white race, physicians’ profession, seasonal influenza vaccine, direct COVID-19 patient care, and confidence in COVID-19 vaccine safety and effectiveness were positive predictors of vaccine uptake, while history of SARS-CoV-2 infection was a negative predictor. Deep understanding of the factors that influence HCWs’ decisions to receive a COVID-19 vaccine is critical to implementing tailored communication strategies for HCWs who are at risk for not getting vaccinated.
“…Therefore, HCWs' stance towards vaccines might change as more information on how COVID-19 vaccines are developed and tested becomes available. It should be noted that higher pooled acceptance rate (78%) among HCWs in China was reported which was explained by the availability of comprehensive scientific evidence and tremendous information related to COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines at an unprecedented pace which drive HCWs to become more aware of safety and effectiveness of different vaccines 24 . www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Evidence suggests the importance of building the trust of guardians in COVID-19 vaccines to be able to achieve children vaccination.…”
The promise of COVID-19 vaccines in ending the pandemic can only be achieved by overcoming the challenge of vaccine refusal. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are the trusted advisors of vaccination decisions. Recommendations for vaccinating children against COVID-19 are recently gaining more public health attention due to the role of children in disease transmission and associated morbidities. Vaccination is one of the first medical decisions parents or guardians make on behalf of their children. To investigate the determinants associated with vaccine acceptability among the general population through a direct interview questionnaire and assess guardians’ views towards childhood COVID-19 vaccinations. This cross-sectional study included 2919 participants A pre-designed structured questionnaire about COVID-19 vaccination acceptability was completed by trained interviewers and interviewing the participants or their guardians (for those below 18 years old). Nearly two-thirds of participants (66.5%) accepted vaccination, 20.2% were refusing and 13.3% were hesitant. Most participants who were guardians of children below 12 years and from 13 to 17 years reported that they would accept vaccination of their children (72.5% and 70.5%, respectively). The acceptance rate among HCWs was 58.2%. The main reasons beyond vaccine refusal were mistrust of vaccine efficacy (39.5%) and having concerns regarding vaccine safety (38.8%). In a multivariable regression model, being male (OR 1.362, 95% CI 1.082–1.714, p = 0.008) resident in rural area (OR 1.796, 95% CI 1.435–2.247, p = 0.000), and lower education (OR 1.245, 95% CI 1.018–1.523, p = 0.033) were associated with an increased acceptance to be vaccinated. The acceptance rate for vaccinating children reported among their guardians was higher than adults for themselves. Extremes of age showed higher vaccine acceptance compared to young adults. Upper Egypt governorates (Faiyum and Giza) were outpacing Lower Egypt governorates in vaccination acceptance rates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.