COVID-19 vaccination mandates and vaccine uptake

Karaivanov, Alexander; Kim, Dongwoo; Lu, Shih En; Shigeoka, Hitoshi

doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01363-1

Cited by 82 publications

(102 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In Canada, Lu and colleagues looked at certificate-based policies implemented across nine provinces from July to September of 2021, as the number of daily vaccines being administered was falling 2 . Lu used a technique, regularly deployed in economics, called differences in differences.…”

Section: Policy Choicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Did COVID vaccine mandates work? What the data say

Drew

2022

Nature

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

or four weekends across July and August last year, around 200,000 protesters took to the streets and squares of France, united in opposition to President Emmanuel Macron's pass sanitaire. Soon, to enter cinemas, museums, cafés, trains and other shared public venues, people in France would have to present evidence that By Liam DrewA health-pass programme in France sparked weeks of angry protest last year.

show abstract

Section: Policy Choicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Did COVID vaccine mandates work? What the data say

Drew

2022

Nature

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additional widespread mandates may reduce the warm glow felt by individuals who vaccinate out of concern for others. However, Karaivanov et al (2021) find evidence that COVID-19 vaccination mandates are very effective overall, limiting such a concern. Schmelz and Bowles (2021) note that the implementation of mandates may increase COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Vaccination as personal public-good provision

Reddinger

Charness

Levine

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vaccination has both private and public benefits. We ask whether social preferences—concerns for the well-being of other people—influence one’s decision regarding vaccination. We measure these social preferences for 549 online subjects: We give each subject $4 to play a public-good game and make contributions to public welfare. To the extent that one gets vaccinated out of concern for the health of others, contribution in this game is analogous to an individual’s decision to obtain vaccination. We collect COVID-19 vaccination history separately to avoid experimenter-demand effects. We find a strong result: Contribution in the public-good game is associated with greater demand to voluntarily receive a first dose, and thus also to vaccinate earlier. Compared to a subject who contributes nothing, one who contributes the maximum ($4) is 48% more likely to obtain a first dose voluntarily in the four-month period that we study (April through August 2021). People who are more pro-social are indeed more likely to take a voluntary COVID-19 vaccination.

show abstract

“…First, Mills and Rüttenauer (2022) look at a 60-day window and find increases in vaccination rates of 13 and 6.7 percentage points respectively for France and Italy, but no significant effet for Germany. Second, Karaivanov et al (2021) find increases in vaccination rates of 6, 10 and 4.3 percentage points respectively France, Italy and Germany over a 3-4 months window. Finally, François et al (2021) look at France and find a 7.5 percentage point increase over three weeks.…”

Section: Figure 4 Total Daily Doses (Black Curve) and Daily First Dos...mentioning

confidence: 86%

Which policies for vaccine innovation and delivery in Europe?

Dewatripont

2022

International Journal of Industrial Organization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

COVID-19 vaccination mandates and vaccine uptake

Cited by 82 publications

References 40 publications

Did COVID vaccine mandates work? What the data say

Did COVID vaccine mandates work? What the data say

Vaccination as personal public-good provision

Which policies for vaccine innovation and delivery in Europe?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About