2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21196581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 Testing and Diagnostics: A Review of Commercialized Technologies for Cost, Convenience and Quality of Tests

Abstract: Population-scale and rapid testing for SARS-CoV-2 continues to be a priority for several parts of the world. We revisit the in vitro technology platforms for COVID-19 testing and diagnostics—molecular tests and rapid antigen tests, serology or antibody tests, and tests for the management of COVID-19 patients. Within each category of tests, we review the commercialized testing platforms, their analyzing systems, specimen collection protocols, testing methodologies, supply chain logistics, and related attributes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eligible studies were published between 2011 and 2021. The 31 articles included 15 reviews [ 10 , 12 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ], 1 website of an international organisation [ 33 ], 2 randomised controlled trials [ 34 , 35 ], 1 cross-sectional study [ 36 ], 1 case study [ 37 ], 1 cohort study [ 38 ] and 10 studies that used mixed method approaches ranging from focus group discussions to interviews to direct observations [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. The included articles presented evidence of research conducted in the following countries: Mozambique [ 34 , 36 , 44 ], Zimbabwe [ 49 ], Ghana [ 12 , 21 , 22 , 40 , 45 , 48 ], Malawi [ 42 ], Namibia [ 41 ], India [ 43 ], Sierra Leone [ 37 ], Burkina Faso [ 38 ], The Philippines [ ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The eligible studies were published between 2011 and 2021. The 31 articles included 15 reviews [ 10 , 12 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ], 1 website of an international organisation [ 33 ], 2 randomised controlled trials [ 34 , 35 ], 1 cross-sectional study [ 36 ], 1 case study [ 37 ], 1 cohort study [ 38 ] and 10 studies that used mixed method approaches ranging from focus group discussions to interviews to direct observations [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. The included articles presented evidence of research conducted in the following countries: Mozambique [ 34 , 36 , 44 ], Zimbabwe [ 49 ], Ghana [ 12 , 21 , 22 , 40 , 45 , 48 ], Malawi [ 42 ], Namibia [ 41 ], India [ 43 ], Sierra Leone [ 37 ], Burkina Faso [ 38 ], The Philippines [ ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence on the following POC diagnostic tests were provided: COVID-19 [ 27 , 28 , 33 ]; HIV [ 10 , 12 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 34 , 36 , 42 , 49 ]; malaria [ 10 , 12 , 22 , 23 , 34 , 35 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]; syphilis [ 10 , 12 , 23 , 32 , 34 , 39 , 42 , 45 ]; tuberculosis [ 30 , 31 ] and others comprising of anaemia [ 34 , 40 ], UTI [ 37 ], diabetes [ 12 , 31 ], blood glucose [ 22 ], preeclampsia urinalysis [ 37 ], urine pregnancy [ 22 ], urine protein [ 22 , 34 ], haemoglobin [ 22 ], dyslipidaemia […”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These reported levels are not sensitive enough to detect the target virus in nasal swab samples at an early stage of infection where the viral load can be lower than 100 copies/mL, according to a clinical study [15]. Immunoglobulin tests detecting Immunoglobulin G (IgG) or Immunoglobulin M (IgM) lack specificity, do not respond to early-stage infection, and may produce false positives for the vaccinated population [16][17][18]. Other detection methods are more promising in accuracy and screening time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoassays for infectious diseases are widely used to detect pathogen-associated antigens or antibodies against pathogens in patient serum. Although these assays are relatively simple to perform and require a short turnaround time, they are relatively insensitive, making it difficult to evaluate clinical samples containing low concentrations of target molecules [1][2][3]. Moreover, because several days are needed for patients to make sufficient concentrations of antigens or antibodies to be detected by these assays, they are not suitable for early diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%