COVID-19 som kriseinduceret styringslaboratorium

Torfing, Jacob; Bentzen, Tina Øllgaard; Jensen, Didde Cramer

doi:10.7146/politica.v54i3.133921

politica

2022

DOI: 10.7146/politica.v54i3.133921

|View full text |Cite

COVID-19 som kriseinduceret styringslaboratorium

Jacob Torfing¹,

Tina Øllgaard Bentzen²,

Didde Cramer Jensen³

Abstract: På en tragisk baggrund viser dette studie, at COVID-19-pandemien har været katalysator for innovationer i både velfærdsløsninger og den danske offentlige sektors maskinrum. På baggrund af såvel kvantitative som kvalitative data beskriver artiklen dels de nye velfærdsløsningers karakter og oplevede effekt i forhold til udsatte borgere, dels en række forudgående organisatoriske innovationer i forhold til tillidsbaseret ledelse og tværgående samarbejde. På denne baggrund genereres og diskuteres en hypotese om en … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 30 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Against a tragic background of illness, death and economic hardship, public sectors around the world have produced numerous innovations in response to the immense pressures from the pandemic, lockdowns and the new health regulations. These crisis-induced innovations have transformed both the form and function of administrative systems and the provision of services to citizens (Torfing et al 2022). Some of them might vanish with the…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction

Torfing¹

2023

Rethinking Public Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This book argues that public governance is changing so rapidly and profoundly that public administration research is struggling to keep up and to keep track of the changes and their various implications. A broad range of well-established principles, perceptions and forms of governing in the public sector are being challenged by new ideas, concepts and practices that, when taken together, are transforming the modus operandi of public governance. Hence, new and emerging forms of political leadership, public management, public organization, administrative steering, cross-boundary collaboration, public regulation and societal problem-solving are being combined with new digital technologies and a novel focus on the production of innovative public value outcomes.The pace of governance changes has accelerated in recent decades. After half a century of an almost undisputed reign of liberal democracy and public bureaucracy, New Public Management (NPM) reforms swept the world beginning in the late 1970s. Despite their positive impact and results, these NPM practices soon gave rise to an array of criticisms that, in the subsequent decades, spurred the proliferation of several new governance paradigms. Hence, public administration researchers started talking about the Neo-Weberian State (Pollitt & Bouckaert 2011), Digital Era Governance (Dunleavy 2006), Public Value Management (Benington & Moore 2010) and New Public Governance (Osborne 2010). In many cases, the new ideas about public governance triggered reforms, resulting in new practices. While it is difficult to explain the growing pace of public governance reforms, globalization, new technologies, growing citizen demands and the recognition of the planetary limits seem to have disrupted the established forms of public governance and have engaged elected politicians, public managers and an army of private consultants in experimentation, learning and innovation diffusion. In other words, changes in the public sector reflect both external societal change and internal agency-based learning and entrepreneurship.The COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the transformation of public governance. Against a tragic background of illness, death and economic hardship, public sectors around the world have produced numerous innovations in response to the immense pressures from the pandemic, lockdowns and the new health regulations. These crisis-induced innovations have transformed both the form and function of administrative systems and the provision of services to citizens (Torfing et al. 2022). Some of them might vanish with the

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction

Torfing¹

2023

Rethinking Public Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

COVID-19 som kriseinduceret styringslaboratorium

Cited by 1 publication

References 30 publications

Introduction

Introduction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About