COVID-19, social isolation, and psychological distress in a Brazilian sample.

Mendonça, Raíssa Oliveira de; Almeida, Mylena Maria Ribeiro de; Garcia, Talita Barroso; Viana, Normando José Queiroz; Maximino, Caio

doi:10.1037/pne0000280

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In fact, the most dramatic elements of the pandemic were identified as social isolation [ 53 , 54 ] and the fear of a SARS-CoV-2 infection [ 55 , 56 ], thus, in a broad sense, suffering, death and socio-economic problems [ 57 , 58 ]. Yet as far as the residents were concerned, the financial problems were not influential (indeed, the increased work was rewarded) and the presence on the ward and the support of the team contrasted the social isolation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is This All COVID-19′s Fault? A Study on Trainees in One of the Most Affected Italian Cities

Manfredi¹

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many studies have investigated the state of the health of healthcare workers during the acute period of the pandemic. Yet, few studies have assessed the health of such professionals after the pandemic and in a less dramatic period. This study involved a particular sample represented by residents in anaesthesia–resuscitation and psychiatry at a university in northern Italy particularly affected by the pandemic. The objectives were to investigate some indicators of health and well-being and compare the two groups of trainees. Using Google Forms, the following tests were proposed: the General Health Questionnaire, Maslach Burnout Inventory, Subjective Happiness Scale, Satisfaction with Life Scale, Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, Brief Resilience Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, as well as an ad hoc questionnaire. A qualifying element of the work was the discussion of the results with the trainees. Various strengths have emerged, such as high values of resilience and job satisfaction; a positive assessment of the support received from the work team; an articulate use of coping strategies; and good levels of happiness and satisfaction with life, in both specialities. However, a widespread anxiety also emerged, which appears to be more attributable to concerns about professional evaluation, rather than the pandemic itself. In summary, the trainees seem to have found a fair amount of personal balance, whereas the relationship with the patient seems to be more compromised. In the comparison between specialities, the only significant differences are the levels of depersonalisation and resilience, both of which are higher in anaesthetists.

show abstract