COVID-19–Sensitive Tumour Response – 2-Year Assessment of the SARS-CoV-2 Humoral Response in Cancer Patients in Oncology Hospital in Poland

Abstract

Background: So far, vaccination has been considered the most crucial defense against viral infection, including SARS-CoV-2. Numerous reports have demonstrated the effectiveness of the above vaccines in oncology patients. It has also been proven that, apart from vaccinations and oncological therapy, the course of the cancer process itself influences the magnitude of the humoral response, especially in people after infection with SARS-CoV-2.
 Objective: This study aimed to answer the question about the impact of the cancer process on the humoral response in oncological patients vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 infection and in patients after COVID-19.
 Material and methods: 1,668 people were observed. Over two years, 5,082 SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibody samples were determined. The concentration of antibodies was assessed in three groups of oncological patients: those undergoing anticancer therapy after contracting COVID-19 and those after vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 infection.
 Results: The obtained results indicate a naturally more significant humoral response in oncological patients who have not been vaccinated and have not undergone anticancer therapy, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgical intervention. The above observation applies to patients with breast, lung, and colon cancer, although the response varies significantly depending on the type of cancer.
 Summary: The size of the humoral response and the presence of specific antibodies directed against the SARS-CoV-2, IgM, and IgG, in response to the supply of the vaccine antigen or assessed after COVID-19, is an indicator of adequate immune protection against reinfection.
 This study highlights for the first time the phenomenon of increased humoral response in response to a viral infection in patients with certain types of cancer that are assumed to be sensitive to oncological therapy, the initiation of which, according to generally accepted principles, was blocked by infection with the SARS-CoV-2. The phenomenon we observe seems to confirm the presence of a "natural" defence potential in a cancer patient's body, in this case, directed against infection with a viral pathogen. A "stronger" antiviral response also seems to explain the asymptomatic course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in some of the above patients. It remains an open question to what extent the SARS-CoV-2 infection weakened the "natural" potential of the anticancer response in these patients.