COVID-19 safety measures at the Radiology Unit of a Transplant Institute: the non-COVID-19 patient’s confidence with safety procedures

Abstract

Purpose To support the wellbeing of both patients and their families, our aim was to investigate the satisfaction of non-COVID in- and out-patients regarding safety measures implemented at our radiology unit of a transplant institute against COVID infection. Materials and Methods Over a five-month period, adult patients’ feedback was obtained by a questionnaire on the fear of contracting COVID-19 during a radiology examination, the perceived delay in treatment, and the following safety measures implemented: modified schedules to limit the number of patients in the waiting area and to maximize social distancing; assistance by staff when visitors were not admitted; cleaning and disinfection of machines; mask wearing and hand hygiene of staff; and staff advice on hand hygiene and infection control precautions. Results Over a five-month period, our preliminary results (387 patients) showed general patient satisfaction (99.1%) with safety measures applied at our radiology unit. Patients were satisfied with distancing and assistance by staff (100%), cleaning and disinfection (91%), mask wearing and hand hygiene of the staff (97%), and staff advice (94%). There was some criticism of the perceived delay in treatment (7.3%) and in the scheduling of the waiting list (5.4%), with 5.4% fearing contracting the virus. Patients’ awareness of safety measures and confidence in the hospital preparedness policy was perceived by all interviewers, and 100% appreciated being questioned. Conclusion The feedback given by the non-COVID patient helps to measure the quality in health care, to improve the quality service, and to protect and satisfy more vulnerable patients, also during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Gender Medicine in Clinical Radiology Practice

“…In fact, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated a CT-score cut-off of 14.5 to have 100% sensitivity and 91.9% specificity for predicting poor prognosis in women younger than 60 years. The pandemic has also necessitated the development of models to support clinical practice using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques [ 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ]. Currently, the supporting models reported in the literature regarding COVID-19 have mainly focused on epidemic trends, early screening, and CT diagnosis as well as prognosis [ 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 ].…”

Radiation Recall Pneumonitis: The Open Challenge in Differential Diagnosis of Pneumonia Induced by Oncological Treatments

“…With regard to treatment-related pneumonitis chest radiography, due to its low specificity, it can be used as a screening investigation, while the role of PET is still unclear due to the potential overlap of the metabolic activity of infectious processes with malignant tumors. Chest CT allows early parenchymal changes and their evolution to be evaluated, thus representing the gold standard for the study of lung parenchyma [ 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 ]. Nevertheless, diagnosis is complicated due to the overlapping of the various CT patterns, and in this scenario, we should consider radiation pneumonia (RP), pneumonia by immune checkpoint inhibitors (CIP) and the possibility that the lung involvement is due to disease progression that may be manifested as pulmonary lymphangitis [ 89 ].…”

Tips and Tricks in Thoracic Radiology for Beginners: A Findings-Based Approach

“…Patients with acute respiratory symptoms and HRCT depicting patchy and peripheral ground-glass opacities (GGOs), in combination with smooth septal thickening and airspace consolidation, are likely to be affected by pneumonia, especially COVID-19. This new entity has partially changed the diagnostic workflow since CT findings can be supportive of the diagnosis of COVID-19 in patients with a negative nasopharyngeal swab, thanks to the high sensitivity and good interreader agreement of CT [ 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 ]. Even if the role of CXR is still debated, it is unequivocally useful in bedridden patients for evaluation of response to treatments, especially in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in an intensive care unit (ICU) [ 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 ].…”