2021
DOI: 10.1080/19371918.2021.1997864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19’s Social Ecological Impacts on Health and Human Services Worker Well-being

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerns for personal and family safety when conducting home visits or face-to-face welfare checks were likely to add to workers’ levels of stress and anxiety. Magruder et al (2022) found that 43.9% of the child welfare workforce indicated negative effects on multiple areas of well-being due to COVID-19. In addition, the merging of personal and professional responsibilities due to stay-at-home orders, particularly for those with younger children, increased stress levels and the potential to be more vulnerable to the effects of trauma exposure (Magruder et al, 2022; Miller et al, 2020).…”
Section: Contextual Consideration Of the Effects Of Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns for personal and family safety when conducting home visits or face-to-face welfare checks were likely to add to workers’ levels of stress and anxiety. Magruder et al (2022) found that 43.9% of the child welfare workforce indicated negative effects on multiple areas of well-being due to COVID-19. In addition, the merging of personal and professional responsibilities due to stay-at-home orders, particularly for those with younger children, increased stress levels and the potential to be more vulnerable to the effects of trauma exposure (Magruder et al, 2022; Miller et al, 2020).…”
Section: Contextual Consideration Of the Effects Of Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other scholars have argued that there might exist a relationship between social locations (i.e., privileges, marginalities) and the exacerbation of psychosocial impacts, especially for individuals who are BIPOC (Gianfrancesco et al, 2021 ; Lund, 2020 ; Sze et al, 2020 ), women (Cabarkapa et al, 2020 ; Danet Danet, 2021 ; Volk et al, 2021 ), parents and caregivers (Magruder et al, 2021 ; Volk et al, 2021 ), people with disabilities (Cieza et al, 2021 ; Shakespeare et al, 2021 ), and queer and trans people (Kamal et al, 2021 ; Ruprecht et al, 2020 ). One study empirically confirmed that social workers ( n = 1568) who were married, heterosexual, physically healthier and more financially secure generally reported less distress than other clinicians (Miller et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of frontline healthcare workers ( n = 103) conducted by Bender et al ( 2021 ) explicated that while interpersonal connection was increasingly difficult due to quarantine and isolation protocols, emotional connectedness was nonetheless a supportive coping strategy that strengthened practitioners’ resilience during COVID-19. Exploring the ecological impacts of COVID-19 on health and human service workers ( n = 531), Magruder and colleagues ( 2021 ) found that practitioners experienced impacts across various proximal and distal domains, including (1) interpersonal impacts, such as fear of infecting loved ones; (2) intrapersonal impacts, such as facing infection or hospitalization themselves; (3) organizational impacts, such as increased caseloads at work; (4) community impacts, such as isolation from community; and, (5) public policy impacts, such as uncertainty or frustration with governmental policy responses to COVID-19. To add, in the qualitative portion of a recent large-scale Canadian survey, social workers ( n = 2470) reported experiencing the following nine themes: increased work-load; loss of employment; redeployment to new settings; early retirement; concern for personal health and safety; social workers in private practice seeing fewer clients; personal caregiving responsibilities; limiting recent graduates’ employment potential and social workers experiencing new opportunities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, a national study identified these professionals only stay in their positions for less than 2 years and estimates of turnover are reported to range from 15% to 40% (Boyas, Wind, & Ruiz, 2013;Edwards & Wildeman, 2018). Research has shown that stress associated with working in this field is responsible for employee turnover and negative outcomes for families and children (Griffiths, Desrosiers, Gabbard, Royse, & Piescher, 2019a;Royse & Griffiths, 2019), and the heightened stress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic may further contribute to this national problem (Gallup, 2021;Magruder, Wilke, Radey, Cain, & Yelick, 2022).…”
Section: Introduction and Presenting Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%