2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2021.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 Reinfection in An Immunosuppressed Patient Without An Antibody Response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, none could define which characteristics are associated with reinfection. For example, there is evidence to suggest immune responses are weaker following asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 infections 20 and in immunocompromised patients, 21 which may increase susceptibility to repeat infection. Mucosal immunity and neutralising antibodies present in respiratory secretions may be more important for sterilising immunity than circulating IgG levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, none could define which characteristics are associated with reinfection. For example, there is evidence to suggest immune responses are weaker following asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 infections 20 and in immunocompromised patients, 21 which may increase susceptibility to repeat infection. Mucosal immunity and neutralising antibodies present in respiratory secretions may be more important for sterilising immunity than circulating IgG levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, none could define which characteristics are associated with reinfection. For example, there is evidence to suggest immune responses are weaker following asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections 20 and in immunocompromised patients, 21 which may increase susceptibility to repeat infection.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to published studies, the possible explanations for reinfection would be: infection by a different strain that can avoid, at least in part, the immune response [6–8, 11, 22, 30]; intensive re-exposure to the virus [11, 13, 25]; or a poor immune response [10–12]. The latter might be due to age [13], previous immunological involvement [19, 31] or, as previously indicated, in relation to a first non-severe infection [20–22, 29]. In our series there was re-exposure and circumstances that might imply a weak response (a third were older than 65 years, 12.5 % had a previous immunosuppressive comorbidity, there were no severe cases, 87.5 % were either asymptomatic or mild, and only 38 % for whom serology was performed in the first episode were positive).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most cases of re‐infection have a mild clinical course, 5,6 in our case, the repeat episode also presented as a severe disease with a new‐onset GGOs—classical lung features of COVID‐19. There is growing evidence of repeat infections occurring in immunocompromised who do not mount an antibody response, being more severe than the primary infection 8,9 . This is an important consideration for special populations with significant co‐morbidity and/or immunodeficiency, where natural infection or vaccination may not provide sufficient immunity to re‐infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%