Background
COVID-19 has recently been associated with the development of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM). This scoping review aims to summarize the existing evidence regarding TCM in COVID-19 and offer future direction for study.
Methods
Following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for all peer-reviewed articles with relevant keywords including “Takotsubo”, “Stress-induced cardiomyopathy” and “COVID-19” from their inception to September 25, 2021.
Results
A total of 40 articles with 52 cases were included. Patients with TCM and COVID-19 showed only slight female predominance (59.6%), median age of 68.5 years, and were mostly of the apical subtype (88.6%). All-cause mortality was 36.5%. The median LVEF was 30%. Compared to those without TCM, those with TCM in COVID-19 had more critical illness, higher mortality, lower LVEF, and higher cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers. Notably, the diagnostic criteria of TCM were considerably different between case reports and observational studies.
Conclusion
This scoping review identifies that TCM in COVID-19 may have distinct features that distinguish this condition from TCM without COVID-19. Future studies are warranted to help describe risk factors, determine the utility of inflammatory biomarkers and serum catecholamine levels, and establish disease-specific diagnostic criteria.
Background
COVID-19 has recently been associated with the development of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM). This scoping review aims to summarize the existing evidence regarding TCM in COVID-19 and offer future direction for study.
Methods
Following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for all peer-reviewed articles with relevant keywords including “Takotsubo”, “Stress-induced cardiomyopathy” and “COVID-19” from their inception to September 25, 2021.
Results
A total of 40 articles with 52 cases were included. Patients with TCM and COVID-19 showed only slight female predominance (59.6%), median age of 68.5 years, and were mostly of the apical subtype (88.6%). All-cause mortality was 36.5%. The median LVEF was 30%. Compared to those without TCM, those with TCM in COVID-19 had more critical illness, higher mortality, lower LVEF, and higher cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers. Notably, the diagnostic criteria of TCM were considerably different between case reports and observational studies.
Conclusion
This scoping review identifies that TCM in COVID-19 may have distinct features that distinguish this condition from TCM without COVID-19. Future studies are warranted to help describe risk factors, determine the utility of inflammatory biomarkers and serum catecholamine levels, and establish disease-specific diagnostic criteria.
“…Mechanical circulatory support (V-V ECMO) was provided only in one patient (20). Thromboembolic events occured in 2 cases (17,25), arrhythmia in other 2 cases (38,42), and shock in 7 cases (19,22,23,25,26,29,33). Since sepsis and cytokine storm accompany the clinical course of severe COVID-19, it might be difficult to separate the hemodynamic effects of the underlying sepsis from TTS.…”
“…67 In an observational study of 118 consecutive confirmed COVID-19 patients (median age 66 years, all men) undergoing transthoracic echocardiography, 5 (4.2%) patients had features compatible with TTC; however, these patients had no coronary angiography to exclude CAD. 68 There have been several case reports of TTC in patients with COVID-19; [69][70][71][72][73][74][75] one particular case with reverse TTC (akinesia of the LV basal and midventricular wall with apex sparing) was reported to complicate the course of fulminant COVID-19 associated with cytokine release syndrome, whereby inotropic therapy failed, and the patient responded well to therapeutic plasma exchange. 76 In a literature review that yielded 16 COVID-19 patients with TTC (median age 57; 50% male) of which 11/16 patients' individual data were available, 4 out of 11 (36.4%) patients had cardiac complications such as atrial fibrillation, pericardial effusion, cardiogenic shock, and heart failure.…”
Section: Acute Coronary Syndromes With Normal or Near-normal Coronariesmentioning
In the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, acute cardiac injury (ACI), as reflected by elevated cardiac troponin above the 99th percentile, has been observed in 8%-62% of patients with COVID-19 infection with highest incidence and mortality recorded in patients with severe infection. Apart from the clinically and electrocardiographically discernible causes of ACI, such as acute myocardial infarction (MI), other cardiac causes need to be considered such as myocarditis, Takotsubo syndrome, and direct injury from COVID-19, together with noncardiac conditions, such as pulmonary embolism, critical illness, and sepsis. Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with normal or near-normal coronary arteries (ACS-NNOCA) appear to have a higher prevalence in both COVID-19 positive and negative patients in the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic era. Echocardiography, coronary angiography, chest computed tomography and/or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may render a correct diagnosis, obviating the need for endomyocardial biopsy. Importantly, a significant delay has been recorded in patients with ACS seeking advice for their symptoms, while their routine care has been sharply disrupted with fewer urgent coronary angiographies and/or primary percutaneous coronary interventions performed in the case of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) with an inappropriate shift toward thrombolysis, all contributing to a higher complication rate in these patients. Thus, new challenges have emerged in rendering a diagnosis and delivering treatment in patients with ACI/ACS in the pandemic era. These issues, the various mechanisms involved in the development of ACI/ACS, and relevant current guidelines are herein reviewed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
