2021
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab164.826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 passes and public health law: Considerations for surveillance and social justice

Abstract: The first panellist will focus on the jurists view on the legislative proposal on DCC, discuss proportionality of measure, incl. key considerations for DCC and PLF data combinations. A basic overview on the differences between vaccination, certificates, immunity passports and other passes, and the key characteristics of the DCC will be provided. Feasibility in terms of implementing acts across EU Member-States will be elaborated upon, incl. both potential expiry and revocation, as well as potential remedies in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, a certain amount of published research has appeared, which is understandably limited both in terms of number and content due to the recent appearance of the DCC. Although the contents of the research often intertwine and touch on diverse but related issues, in our opinion they can generally be classified into three larger groups with common characteristics, namely epidemiological concerns, attitudes to vaccination, and health outcomes [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]; public health, healthcare and social policies and measures [ 12 , 13 , 14 ], and legal aspects, democratic values, and human rights [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Even if some articles touch on individual digital tools for managing the COVID-19 pandemic, the content of the research mostly refers to applications for contact tracing, international comparisons of the DCC projects and implementation approaches, and analysis of security or privacy of the end-user’s personal data [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a certain amount of published research has appeared, which is understandably limited both in terms of number and content due to the recent appearance of the DCC. Although the contents of the research often intertwine and touch on diverse but related issues, in our opinion they can generally be classified into three larger groups with common characteristics, namely epidemiological concerns, attitudes to vaccination, and health outcomes [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]; public health, healthcare and social policies and measures [ 12 , 13 , 14 ], and legal aspects, democratic values, and human rights [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Even if some articles touch on individual digital tools for managing the COVID-19 pandemic, the content of the research mostly refers to applications for contact tracing, international comparisons of the DCC projects and implementation approaches, and analysis of security or privacy of the end-user’s personal data [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%