2022
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 pandemic in Africa’s island nations during the first 9 months: a descriptive study of variation in patterns of infection, severe disease, and response measures

Abstract: The geographic and economic characteristics unique to island nations create a different set of conditions for, and responses to, the spread of a pandemic compared with those of mainland countries. Here, we aimed to describe the initial period of the COVID-19 pandemic, along with the potential conditions and responses affecting variation in the burden of infections and severe disease burden, across the six island nations of the WHO’s Africa region: Cabo Verde, Comoros, Madagascar, Mauritius, São Tomé e Príncipe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many countries in the WHO West Pacific Region adopted policies closer to the elimination model, perhaps in part due to the region’s previous experience with SARS 11 , 13 . Relatedly, it has also been hypothesized that island nations may have been more likely to pursue elimination models during COVID-19 due to their geographical advantage of isolation and ability to seal national borders, although for many low-income countries (LICs) and LMICs, this came at appreciable economic cost 11 , 15 18 . Finally, early responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have also highlighted distinctions between mitigation and elimination strategies based on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, such as high-performing surveillance systems with early and targeted contact tracing and widespread efficient testing in eliminator countries 12 , 14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many countries in the WHO West Pacific Region adopted policies closer to the elimination model, perhaps in part due to the region’s previous experience with SARS 11 , 13 . Relatedly, it has also been hypothesized that island nations may have been more likely to pursue elimination models during COVID-19 due to their geographical advantage of isolation and ability to seal national borders, although for many low-income countries (LICs) and LMICs, this came at appreciable economic cost 11 , 15 18 . Finally, early responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have also highlighted distinctions between mitigation and elimination strategies based on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, such as high-performing surveillance systems with early and targeted contact tracing and widespread efficient testing in eliminator countries 12 , 14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 13 Notably, the establishment of the GRAPH network-a group of African multidisciplinary scientists and international collaborators-during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic has remained very instrumental to the continued understanding of the COVID-19 pandemic dynamics in the African region. [14][15][16][17] Certainly, with these developments, we believe that the WHO AFRO and other African health partners are already well positioned to support the development of a sustainable forecasting capacity in Africa for future pandemics as well as other emergencies.…”
Section: Summary Boxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because, for example, the GRAPH network and WHO Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence, which seek to strengthen surveillance systems and data analytics for improved decision-making during public health emergencies in the African region and globally, respectively, have recognised modelling as an essential component of their activities 12 13. Notably, the establishment of the GRAPH network—a group of African multidisciplinary scientists and international collaborators—during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic has remained very instrumental to the continued understanding of the COVID-19 pandemic dynamics in the African region 14–17. Certainly, with these developments, we believe that the WHO AFRO and other African health partners are already well positioned to support the development of a sustainable forecasting capacity in Africa for future pandemics as well as other emergencies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The burden of severe COVID-19 outcomes was the highest in African countries with older populations, limited healthcare resources, and a high frequency of pre-existing health risks such as cancer, diabetes, air pollution, and obesity. [4][5][6][7] However, multiple factors can weaken epidemic preparedness. Preparedness in low-income countries (LICs) is further faced by the general weakness of health structures: poor quality of healthcare, low human resources capacity, lack of equipment and facilities, and vulnerable supply chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%