Abstract:Background
The full reopening of schools in September 2020 was associated with an increase in COVID-19 cases and outbreaks in educational settings across England.
Methods
Primary and secondary schools reporting an outbreak (≥2 laboratory-confirmed cases within 14 days) to Public Health England (PHE) between 31 August and 18 October 2020 were contacted in November 2020 to complete an online questionnaire.
Interpretation
There were 969 school o… Show more
“…The UK experience following full reopening of all school years in the autumn term was different to the partial reopening of some primary and secondary school years in the previous summer mini-term [7]. Nationally, SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were higher across all age-groups including children, and there were more infections and outbreaks reported in educational settings during the autumn term [9,19]. Using the same methodology in primary schools, the SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroconversion rate was 5% among staff and students [20], and a lower proportion of primary schools than secondary schools experienced a COVID-19 outbreak during the first half of the autumn term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…), which in-turn will have a small but measurable impact on the reproduction number for SARS-CoV-2 [21]. There is, however, increasing evidence that the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission within school premises is very low, [22À24] especially among students [19]. In North Carolina, for example, surveillance of 11 school districts with more than 90,000 students and staff attending school in-person for 9 weeks, found 773 community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infections, while contact tracing found only 32 additional infections that were acquired within school [24].…”
Background: Older children have higher SARS-CoV-2 infection rates than younger children. We investigated SARS-CoV-2 infection, seroprevalence and seroconversion rates in staff and students following the full reopening of all secondary schools in England. Methods: Public Health England (PHE) invited secondary schools in six regions (East and West London, Hertfordshire, Derbyshire, Manchester and Birmingham) to participate in SARS-CoV-2 surveillance during the 2020/21 academic year. Participants had nasal swabs for RT-PCR and blood samples for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at the beginning (September 2020) and end (December 2020) of the autumn term. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent risk factors for seropositivity and seroconversion. Findings: Eighteen schools in six regions enrolled 2,209 participants, including 1,189 (53.8%) students and 1,020 (46.2%) staff. SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were not significantly different between students and staff in round one (5/948; [0.53%] vs. 2/876 [0.23%]; p = 0.46) or round two (10/948 [1.05%] vs. 7/886 [0.79%]; p = 0.63), and similar to national prevalence. None of four and 7/15 (47%) sequenced strains in rounds 1 and 2 were the highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variant. In round 1, antibody seropositivity was higher in students than staff (114/893 [12.8%] vs. 79/861 [9.2%]; p = 0.016), but similar in round 2 (117/893 [13.1%] vs.117/872 [13.3%]; p = 0.85), comparable to local community seroprevalence. Between the two rounds, 8.7% (57/652) staff and 6.6% (36/549) students seroconverted (p = 0.16). Interpretation: In secondary schools, SARS-CoV-2 infection, seropositivity and seroconversion rates were similar in staff and students, and comparable to local community rates. Ongoing surveillance will be important for monitoring the impact of new variants in educational settings.
“…The UK experience following full reopening of all school years in the autumn term was different to the partial reopening of some primary and secondary school years in the previous summer mini-term [7]. Nationally, SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were higher across all age-groups including children, and there were more infections and outbreaks reported in educational settings during the autumn term [9,19]. Using the same methodology in primary schools, the SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroconversion rate was 5% among staff and students [20], and a lower proportion of primary schools than secondary schools experienced a COVID-19 outbreak during the first half of the autumn term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…), which in-turn will have a small but measurable impact on the reproduction number for SARS-CoV-2 [21]. There is, however, increasing evidence that the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission within school premises is very low, [22À24] especially among students [19]. In North Carolina, for example, surveillance of 11 school districts with more than 90,000 students and staff attending school in-person for 9 weeks, found 773 community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infections, while contact tracing found only 32 additional infections that were acquired within school [24].…”
Background: Older children have higher SARS-CoV-2 infection rates than younger children. We investigated SARS-CoV-2 infection, seroprevalence and seroconversion rates in staff and students following the full reopening of all secondary schools in England. Methods: Public Health England (PHE) invited secondary schools in six regions (East and West London, Hertfordshire, Derbyshire, Manchester and Birmingham) to participate in SARS-CoV-2 surveillance during the 2020/21 academic year. Participants had nasal swabs for RT-PCR and blood samples for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at the beginning (September 2020) and end (December 2020) of the autumn term. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent risk factors for seropositivity and seroconversion. Findings: Eighteen schools in six regions enrolled 2,209 participants, including 1,189 (53.8%) students and 1,020 (46.2%) staff. SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were not significantly different between students and staff in round one (5/948; [0.53%] vs. 2/876 [0.23%]; p = 0.46) or round two (10/948 [1.05%] vs. 7/886 [0.79%]; p = 0.63), and similar to national prevalence. None of four and 7/15 (47%) sequenced strains in rounds 1 and 2 were the highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variant. In round 1, antibody seropositivity was higher in students than staff (114/893 [12.8%] vs. 79/861 [9.2%]; p = 0.016), but similar in round 2 (117/893 [13.1%] vs.117/872 [13.3%]; p = 0.85), comparable to local community seroprevalence. Between the two rounds, 8.7% (57/652) staff and 6.6% (36/549) students seroconverted (p = 0.16). Interpretation: In secondary schools, SARS-CoV-2 infection, seropositivity and seroconversion rates were similar in staff and students, and comparable to local community rates. Ongoing surveillance will be important for monitoring the impact of new variants in educational settings.
“…Li et al found that reopening schools was associated with increases in transmission [ 43 ]. Moreover, cases of children testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 have risen following the reopening of schools [ 44 , 45 ]. In the 1 month ending 18 June, 2021, 181 SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks were confirmed in the UK related to primary and secondary schools [ 13 ].…”
Section: Role Of Children In Sars-cov-2 Transmissionmentioning
“…Weekly test positivity data reported by ONS and UKHSA showed a marked rise in positivity rate among secondary school-aged children over this period [8,9]. A similar rise was seen at the start of the previous (2020/21) academic year in England [10], however, the magnitude of the rise has been more pronounced this year. The differences could in part be attributable to increased transmissibility of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta (Phylogenetic Assignment of Named Global Outbreak (Pango) lineage designation B.1.617.2 and AY.…”
Easing of COVID-19 restrictions in England in the summer of 2021 was followed by a sharp rise in cases among school-aged children. Weekly rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection in primary and secondary school children reached 733.3 and 1,664.7/100,000 population, respectively, by week 39 2021. A surge in household clusters with school-aged index cases was noted at the start of the school term, with secondary cases predominantly in children aged 5–15 years and adults aged 30–49 years.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.