COVID-19 outbreak in a religious village community in Republic of Korea and risk factors for transmission

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the scale and transmission patterns of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a religious village community in South Korea, to determine the risk factors of transmission, and to evaluate vaccine effectiveness.Methods: An epidemiological survey was conducted, and data were collected and analyzed from 602 villagers in the religious village community. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for COVID-19 transmission and to evaluate vaccine effectiveness.Results: The outbreak attack rate was 72.1% (434/602). The attack rate was high among women in their 60s, the unemployed, residents living near religious facility (<500 m), and the unvaccinated. Age, the distance between religious facility and residences, and the absence of vaccination were identified as risk factors for transmission. Vaccine effectiveness was 49.0%, and the highest effectiveness was seen in the age group of 59 years or younger (65.8%).Conclusion: This village community was isolated, with little communication with the outside world. However, the frequency of close contact between residents was relatively high, contributing to the spread of COVID-19 in the village even with relatively short exposure. Vaccination rates in the village community were also lower than those in the general public. Public health authorities should consider the potential impact of cultural factors, including religion, that could lead to the exponential spread of COVID-19 in closed village communities.

Trends of fear and anger on YouTube during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea

“…During this period, there was a scarcity of precise information regarding COVID-19. Subsequent investigations conducted by the Korea Centres for Disease Control and Prevention and law enforcement uncovered the extent of the involvement of the Shincheonji Church and the rising social unrest among citizens [ 43 ]. This corresponded to the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.…”