COVID-19 Lung Ultrasound Scores and Lessons from the Pandemic: A Narrative Review

Abstract

The WHO recently declared that COVID-19 no longer constitutes a public health emergency of international concern; however, lessons learned through the pandemic should not be left behind. Lung ultrasound was largely utilized as a diagnostic tool thanks to its feasibility, easy application, and the possibility to reduce the source of infection for health personnel. Lung ultrasound scores consist of grading systems used to guide diagnosis and medical decisions, owning a good prognostic value. In the emergency context of the pandemic, several lung ultrasound scores emerged either as new scores or as modifications of pre-existing ones. Our aim is to clarify the key aspects of lung ultrasound and lung ultrasound scores to standardize their clinical use in a non-pandemic context. The authors searched on PubMed for articles related to “COVID-19”, “ultrasound”, and “Score” until 5 May 2023; other keywords were “thoracic”, “lung”, “echography”, and “diaphragm”. A narrative summary of the results was made. Lung ultrasound scores are demonstrated to be an important tool for triage, prediction of severity, and aid in medical decisions. Ultimately, the existence of numerous scores leads to a lack of clarity, confusion, and an absence of standardization.

A Modified Corona Score Using Lung Ultrasound to Identify COVID-19 Patients

“…The Idea of using risk scores to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection early is important not only for economic efficiency but even more to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions, reducing the waiting times during peak SARS-CoV-2 case and testing periods. The objective of scoring systems is to derive a result that can direct the most precise path to a negative or positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis [ 3 ]. For this reason, it is necessary to create scoring systems that are well-standardized, in which inter-operator variability is reduced as much as possible.…”