COVID-19 infections and fatalities developments: empirical evidence for OECD countries and newly industrialized economies

Abstract

This paper presents empirical results on coronavirus infection and fatality rates from cross-country regressions for OECD economies and a sample of middle- and high-income countries. We include environmental, economic, medical, and policy variables in our analysis to explain the number of corona cases and deaths per million. We find a significant positive impact of local air pollution on infection rates in the whole sample and on fatality rates for OECD countries. Obesity rates have a positive effect on cases and deaths across the different estimation equations. The strategy of aiming to achieve herd immunity has a significant positive effect on infections as well as on death rates. The first affected countries have significantly higher mortality rates, revealing the lack of experience and medical capacity to deal with the pandemic in an initial phase. Postponing – and fighting - the pandemic could save lives in many countries and generate considerable economic benefits. Other medical and policy variables discussed in the public sphere do not show a significant impact in the regression analysis. Our results suggest that improving air quality and fighting obesity helps reduce the negative effects of a coronavirus pandemic significantly. Policy options for fighting a second epidemic wave should take into account the results from this study in order to optimize global epidemic policy.

A Matter of Trust? Political Trust and the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Bretschger et al (2020) find that obesity can partly explain the cross-country variance in Covid-19 cases and deaths. A recent study byO'Hearn et al (2021) discovers that a significant portion of US Covid-19 hospitalizations is related to major cardiometabolic conditions, including…”

“…Francis Fukuyama (2020) The significant heterogeneity across countries regarding their Covid-19 cases and deaths has raised interest in understanding the explanatory factors involved. The growing literature on determinants of Covid-19 fatalities refers to existing healthcare absorptive capacity (Farzanegan 2020), the degree of country globalization (Farzanegan et al 2021a), international tourism (Farzanegan et al 2021b;Stojkoski et al 2020), demographic structure, and population density (Madrazo Cabo et al 2020;Jani and Mavalankar 2020), stage of economic development and share of the shadow economy (Stojkoski et al 2020), quality of formal institutions (Cepaluni et al 2020;Rodríguez-Pose and Burlina 2020), income inequality (Wildman 2021) and rates of obesity and air quality (Bretschger et al 2020) as the significant predicting factors. Part of this literature examines the role of informal institutions on the number of Covid-19 fatalities across countries, for example, the role of cultural dimensions is investigated by Huynh (2020a).…”

An Empirical Investigation on the Relationship Between the Eurozone Zew Index and the Eurozone Stock Markets

“…For this reason, we can state that analyst approaches also contain changes in terms of the ZEW index, and there are differences in interpretive approaches (Boswijk, 1994). Another dimension is that the problem caused by the COVID-19 virus epidemic, which affected all countries of the world at the end of 2019, is an important problem that negatively affects many world economies and exchange rate differences, and increases the importance of causality (Bretschger et al, 2020). There are reasons that affect the stock market and index system, especially the economy (Olweny & Kimani, 2011).…”

The effects ofCOVID‐19 containment measures on the Asia‐Pacific region

“…This paper contributes to a fast-growing literature on the effect of containment measures on health and economic outcomes. Several papers use cross-country or sub-national data to show the role played by containment measures, voluntary social distancing, and other factors in slowing the spread of the virus (e.g., Bretschger et al, 2020;Chernozhukov, Kasahara, and Schrimpf 2020;Dave et al 2020;Deb et al 2020a;Demirgüç-Kunt, Lokshin, and Torre 2020;Fang, Wang, and Yang 2020;Gapen et al, 2020;Glaeser, Gorback, and Redding 2020;Imai et al 2020;Jinjarak et al 2020;Luong and Nguyen, 2020;Zimmermann et al, 2020). Another set of papers look at the economic impact of containment measures, either using high frequency data or recent GDP releases (Carvalho et al 2020;Chronopoulos, Lukas, and Wilson 2020;Deb et al 2020a;Baek et al 2020;Baker et al 2020;Béland, Brodeur, and Wright 2020;Coibion, Gorodnichenko, and Weber 2020;Goolsbee and Syverson, 2020;Gupta et al 2020;Konig andWinkler, 2020a and.…”