COVID-19 in Southeast Asia: Implications for workers and unions

Abstract

The labour market effects in Southeast Asia of the COVID-19 pandemic have attracted considerable analysis from both scholars and practitioners. However, much less attention has been paid to the pandemic’s impact on legal protections for workers’ and unions’ rights, or to what might account for divergent outcomes in this respect in economies that share many characteristics, including a strong export orientation in labour-intensive industries and weak industrial relations institutions. Having described the public health measures taken to control the spread of COVID-19 in Indonesia, Cambodia and Vietnam, this article analyses governments’ employment-related responses and their impact on workers and unions in the first year of the pandemic. Based on this analysis, we conclude that the disruption caused to these countries’ economies, and societies, served to reproduce existing patterns of state–labour relations rather than overturning them.

Modern slavery and the employment relationship: Exploring the continuum of exploitation

“…Cross-border production and sourcing are not new phenomena, yet the increasing scale of these global activities as well as the intricacies of GVCs are unprecedented. The widespread disruption of GVCs due to the Covid-19 pandemic exemplifies exactly how intricate and fragile this global mode of production is, and tragically demonstrates how workers frequently pay the price for the shockwaves going through the system (Ford and Ward, 2021). An added complication is that GVCs are highly abstract: it is difficult if not impossible to truly grasp an entire value chain, and to fully comprehend the flows of information and capital, the transportation of goods and people, production and assembly, and the sourcing of raw materials, all of which occur in different spatial and chronological frames.…”

Influencing the influencers: Regulating the morality of online conduct in Indonesia

“…The legislative process for this Law was unusually quick and somewhat politically devious, with, for example, the labor cluster of amendments removed from debates and then later reintroduced only shortly before the Law was passed (Mahy, 2022). A number of academic commentators have characterized the Job Creation Law, the way it was enacted, and its denial of public sentiment as being a symptom of the wider "democratic decline" occurring in Indonesia in recent years (Ford & Ward, 2021;Mietzner, 2021). 7 The Omnibus Law attracted widespread public opposition during the legislative debate process and after the Law was suddenly enacted.…”

Social dialogue report 2022

“…This has been supported by statutory measures (for example, employment retention schemes). In other cases, though, unprecedented state action has reduced the space for collective bargaining (Ford and Ward 2021;O'Neil 2021). There are also countries in which collective rights have been curtailed by emergency measures (see box 5.1).…”