2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 ICU demand forecasting: A two-stage Prophet-LSTM approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A conversion rate 0.05 was reported for the data collected within a specific interval. The transformation rate is a metric that indicates the speed at which the scores fluctuate over time [ 33 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Deep Learning Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A conversion rate 0.05 was reported for the data collected within a specific interval. The transformation rate is a metric that indicates the speed at which the scores fluctuate over time [ 33 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Deep Learning Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reward function depends on the rate of change of the proposed approach data, the sleep duration, and the TT level. The reward function, Equation (14) , achieves this goal [ 32 , 33 ]: …”
Section: Deep Learning Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation causes customer dissatisfaction and loss of money and time for businesses. The large data size in machine learning increases the success of the trained model [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. For this reason, machine-learning algorithms used in e-commerce web pages can be successful in understanding customer behaviors, making appropriate product recommendations or making sales forecasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Default NP also has achieved the best forecasting performance for the COVID-19 problem 15 compared to Random Forest and Poisson distribution models. Borges et al 16 applied the Prophet-LSTM hybrid model to forecast daily COVID-19 ICU entrances for a Brazilian city and found smaller values for MAEs compared to standalone models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%