2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covid-19: Health and social care workers need, want, and deserve reusable FFP3 respirators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PPE was in short supply in early 2020, [9] which may have made rationing more appropriate, but supply chains have largely recovered -and reusable PPE has both environmental and cost savings. [10] Fit-testing staff adds burden to infection control teams, but NHS trusts which have made the switch have demonstrated it is possible, and there is evidence that reusable elastomeric respirators (but not disposable FFP3 masks) may be used safely with a "fit check" alone. [11] It is clear that tighter-fitting masks can be less comfortableparticularly if the fit is not suitable for the user, but surveyed staff appear in general to prefer the higher level of protection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PPE was in short supply in early 2020, [9] which may have made rationing more appropriate, but supply chains have largely recovered -and reusable PPE has both environmental and cost savings. [10] Fit-testing staff adds burden to infection control teams, but NHS trusts which have made the switch have demonstrated it is possible, and there is evidence that reusable elastomeric respirators (but not disposable FFP3 masks) may be used safely with a "fit check" alone. [11] It is clear that tighter-fitting masks can be less comfortableparticularly if the fit is not suitable for the user, but surveyed staff appear in general to prefer the higher level of protection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%