2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-01166-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19: Has social isolation reduced the emission of pollutants in the megacity of São Paulo—Brazil?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As CO and NO2, similar behavior was observed for PM10 that presented reduction of 27% (2015-2019: 25.2 µg m -3 ; 2020: 18.5 µg m -3 ) for MARJ, 23% (2015-2019: 14.1 µg m -3 ; 2020: 10.8 µg m -3 ) for MAGV, 19% (2015MAGV, 19% ( -2019.9 µg m -3 ; 2020: 14.5 µg m -3 ) for MASP, and 10% (2015-2019: 21.0 µg m -3 ; 2020: 18.8 µg m -3 ) for MAPA. On the other hand, there were significant The results presented here agree with the studies previously carried out for the MASP and MARJ regions (Connerton et al, 2020;Dantas et al, 2020;Debone et al, 2020;Ibarra-Espinosa et al, 2021;Nakada and Urban, 2020;Noda et al, 2021;Rudke et al, 2021;Siciliano et al, 2020a;Tadano et al, 2021), with variations directly related to the study period and how air quality monitoring stations were selected. It should also be noted that even for stations located in the countryside of the States, there is a similar trend in the reduction/increase of air pollutants.…”
Section: Spatial Variability Of Air Quality Changessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As CO and NO2, similar behavior was observed for PM10 that presented reduction of 27% (2015-2019: 25.2 µg m -3 ; 2020: 18.5 µg m -3 ) for MARJ, 23% (2015-2019: 14.1 µg m -3 ; 2020: 10.8 µg m -3 ) for MAGV, 19% (2015MAGV, 19% ( -2019.9 µg m -3 ; 2020: 14.5 µg m -3 ) for MASP, and 10% (2015-2019: 21.0 µg m -3 ; 2020: 18.8 µg m -3 ) for MAPA. On the other hand, there were significant The results presented here agree with the studies previously carried out for the MASP and MARJ regions (Connerton et al, 2020;Dantas et al, 2020;Debone et al, 2020;Ibarra-Espinosa et al, 2021;Nakada and Urban, 2020;Noda et al, 2021;Rudke et al, 2021;Siciliano et al, 2020a;Tadano et al, 2021), with variations directly related to the study period and how air quality monitoring stations were selected. It should also be noted that even for stations located in the countryside of the States, there is a similar trend in the reduction/increase of air pollutants.…”
Section: Spatial Variability Of Air Quality Changessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Earlier studies in southeast Brazil [3,[18][19][20] have focused on early months of partial lockdown (March and April). However, recently, Noda et al [38] used a social isolation index and noticed two distinct time-periods of lockdown in SP: before and after 1 May 2020. The first period was associated with greater reductions in the emissions, while the second period was characterized by greater fluctuations in pollutant concentrations.…”
Section: The Study Area and Time Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first period was associated with greater reductions in the emissions, while the second period was characterized by greater fluctuations in pollutant concentrations. Emphasizing that the pollutant levels were not similar throughout the lockdown, Noda et al [38] called for more studies focusing on the second interval.…”
Section: The Study Area and Time Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journals about health care and the health care policies revolved around research areas focusing on health care system response to Covid-19 (Kendzerska et al, 2021 ), the public’s trust in the health care system (Pak et al, 2021 ), the role of social media in portraying the system (Xu & Sattar, 2020 ), and occupational health safety of health professionals (Hailu et al, 2021 ). The implications of the pandemic in the environment domain are multifaceted, ranging from geo-environmental determinants responsible for the acceleration of Covid-19 diffusion spatially (Bontempi et al, 2020 ), the lethality of air pollution (Barua & Nath, 2021 ), and anthropogenic heat (Noda et al, 2021 ; Pal et al, 2021 ) amidst the global crisis. Work and food consumption patterns and wastes related to this have also received significant attention during the pandemic (Amicarelli et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%