2020
DOI: 10.1111/dom.14256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID‐19 fatality prediction in people with diabetes and prediabetes using a simple score upon hospital admission

Abstract: Aim To assess predictors of in‐hospital mortality in people with prediabetes and diabetes hospitalized for COVID‐19 infection and to develop a risk score for identifying those at the greatest risk of a fatal outcome. Materials and Methods A combined prospective and retrospective, multicentre, cohort study was conducted at 10 sites in Austria in 247 people with diabetes or newly diagnosed prediabetes who were hospitalized with COVID‐19. The primary outcome was in‐hospita… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
50
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
50
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports the findings from a recent study. 36 Even though primary outcome event numbers were small in this group to draw a definitive conclusion, there was no trend towards poorer outcomes, even with baseline CRP level. A graded increase in some biomarkers of inflammation such as white cell count and fibrinogen was reported from normoglycemia to prediabetes to diabetes, while other markers such as neopterin, albumin, and hematocrit showed no such changes in prediabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This supports the findings from a recent study. 36 Even though primary outcome event numbers were small in this group to draw a definitive conclusion, there was no trend towards poorer outcomes, even with baseline CRP level. A graded increase in some biomarkers of inflammation such as white cell count and fibrinogen was reported from normoglycemia to prediabetes to diabetes, while other markers such as neopterin, albumin, and hematocrit showed no such changes in prediabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A total of 4592 records were excluded after screening the titles/abstracts because they did not match our inclusion and exclusion criteria. After evaluating 22 full-texts for eligibility, 7 full-text articles were excluded because they do not have the outcome of interest (severe COVID-19 or mortality), 3 full-text articles were excluded because they do not have the control/comparison group, 2 articles were excluded because the full text not in English, and finally, 10 studies [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] with a total of 7012 COVID-19 patients with diabetes were included in the meta-analysis (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of 946 potentially relevant articles, and following application of inclusion criteria, 32 studies were retained including a total of 44306 participants. The included studies were conducted in Austria [14], Belgium [15], China [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], France [25][26][27], Hong Kong [28], Iraq [29], Italy [30,31], Russia [32]which determines the high relevance of risk factor analysis for outcomes in DM patients to substantiate the strategy for this category of patients. AIM: To assess the effect of clinical and demographic parameters (age, gender, body mass index (BMI, South Korea [33,34], Spain [35,36], UK [37][38][39][40][41] and USA [42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%