COVID-19 exposure risk level in daily activity in adapting to new habits in the pandemic period

Haerana, Bs. Titi; Jalaluddin, Syatirah; Satrianegara, M. Fais; Wijaya, Dian Rezki; Basri, Syahrul; Bujawati, Emmi

doi:10.1016/j.enfcli.2021.10.010

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This corresponded with the current nonsports literature that notes females worry more about infection risk, 32 resulting in males participating in higher COVID-19 risk activities. 33 Thus, a guide to sports departments should be that all-male athletes on all-male teams are at risk throughout the year, and testing resources should be extended beyond the season.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of a Division I Sports Medicine Program's COVID-19 Protocol: Identifying Factors that Predict Testing Demands and Positive Rates During a Pandemic

Stickler,

Morrone,

Brown

et al. 2023

Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To determine factors indicating testing frequency and positive test results in a Division I sports department intrapandemic. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: A single Division I collegiate sports department. Patients: All student-athlete (n = 437), student staff (n = 89), and adult staff (n = 202) members of the sports department. Total cohort (n = 728). Interventions: The authors analyzed the independent variables of local positive rates, sport characteristics, and campus events for impact on the volume of the departmental testing and positive rates. Main Outcome Measures: Measured dependent variables of the volume of departmental testing and positive rates were analyzed. Results: Positive predictive rates (PPRs) largely differed from local, off-campus rates in timing and duration (59.52%: P < 0.05). Overall, 20633 tests were administered with 201 positive results (0.97% PPR). Student-athlete numbers were highest in all categories, followed by adult then student staff. Greater proportions of contact sports became positive (53.03%: P < 0.001) and all-male sports (47.69%: P < 0.001). No comparative difference was seen for teams using fomites (19.15%: P = 0.403). Spring sports teams had the lowest percentage of the team positive (22.22%: P < 0.001). Winter sports had the highest PPR (1.15%), all occurring during team-controlled activities. Playing sports indoors did not increase inside team-controlled activity positive rates (P = 0.066). Conclusions: Longitudinal changes in local, off-campus infection rates partially affected sports departmental positive results while testing rates were more influenced by sport and university schedule. Testing resources should be directed toward high-risk sports, which included contact sports (football, basketball, and soccer), all-male teams, both Winter and indoor sports inside team-controlled activities, and sports with long periods of time outside team-controlled activities.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%