2022
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 Diagnosis and Classification Using Radiological Imaging and Deep Learning Techniques: A Comparative Study

Abstract: In December 2019, the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) appeared. Being highly contagious and with no effective treatment available, the only solution was to detect and isolate infected patients to further break the chain of infection. The shortage of test kits and other drawbacks of lab tests motivated researchers to build an automated diagnosis system using chest X-rays and CT scanning. The reviewed works in this study use AI coupled with the radiological image processing of raw chest X-rays and CT i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, potential limitations encompass the necessity for more extensive coverage of recent developments and practical considerations for clinical implementation to ensure the relevance and applicability of the review findings. In a comparative study, various approaches for diagnosing COVID-19 using radiological imaging and deep learning techniques are evaluated [13]. While furnishing valuable insights into the performance of these approaches, variations in dataset characteristics and model architectures may limit the generalizability of the findings across diverse healthcare settings.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Deep Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, potential limitations encompass the necessity for more extensive coverage of recent developments and practical considerations for clinical implementation to ensure the relevance and applicability of the review findings. In a comparative study, various approaches for diagnosing COVID-19 using radiological imaging and deep learning techniques are evaluated [13]. While furnishing valuable insights into the performance of these approaches, variations in dataset characteristics and model architectures may limit the generalizability of the findings across diverse healthcare settings.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Deep Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of CT images requires expert radiologic assessment and time, both of which may be of limited availability during a pandemic. Furthermore, the extent of lung tissue involvement may vary because of human error, which reduces the accuracy and usefulness of CT radioimaging data for prediction models 13–15 . Lastly, radiological data alone do not account for the remaining clinically important variables, including laboratory parameters, clinical patient data, or comorbidities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide objective measurements that can be easily quantified and analyzed using AI algorithms. This can improve the accuracy and efficiency of COVID‐19 diagnosis 20–24 . Deep learning algorithms require a large amount of high‐quality labeled data for training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can improve the accuracy and efficiency of COVID-19 diagnosis. [20][21][22][23][24] Deep learning algorithms require a large amount of highquality labeled data for training. However, in the case of COVID-19 diagnosis, such data is limited, which can hinder the development and evaluation of effective deeplearning models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%