COVID-19: Besondere Herausforderungen an Public Health in Theorie und Praxis

Holst, Jens

doi:10.1055/a-1276-0847

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 23 publications

(23 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Seit mehreren Jahren bestehen jedoch in der Public-Health-Gemeinschaft Bestrebungen, dieser Zersplitterung entgegenzuwirken und weitere Reformen im Bereich der öffentlichen Gesundheit zu initiieren [4,5]. Diese Reformprozesse wurden unter anderem durch ein Gutachten der Nationalen Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina von 2015 angestoßen [6] und haben durch die SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie neue Dynamik und öffentliche Aufmerksamkeit erfahren [7][8][9].…”

Section: Hintergrundunclassified

Überregionale Public-Health-Akteure in Deutschland – eine Bestandsaufnahme und Kategorisierung

Hommes

Mohsenpour

Kropff

et al. 2021

Bundesgesundheitsbl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Akteure der öffentlichen Gesundheit (Public Health) tragen wesentlich zu Gesundheitsschutz, -förderung und Prävention auf Bevölkerungsebene bei. Kenntnisse über die Akteurslandschaft erleichtern die Zusammenarbeit und erhöhen die Transparenz des Berufsfeldes für Nachwuchsfachkräfte. Zielsetzung Ziel dieser Arbeit waren eine Bestandsaufnahme und Kategorisierung überregionaler Public-Health-Akteure in Deutschland. Methodik Ausgehend von einer Aufstellung der teilnehmenden Institutionen am Zukunftsforum Public Health und zielgerichteter Onlinerecherche wurden überregionale Organisationen mit Public-Health-Schwerpunkt identifiziert. Alle Akteure wurden durch ≥ 2 Autor:innen unabhängig voneinander gescreent. Rein lokal tätige Akteure und solche ohne erkennbaren Public-Health-Schwerpunkt wurden ausgeschlossen. Mittels Schneeballverfahrens wurden weitere Akteure identifiziert. Zur thematischen Clusterung wurde induktiv ein Kategoriensystem gebildet. Ergebnisse Von 645 gescreenten Akteuren wurden 307 (47,6 %) eingeschlossen und 12 Ober- sowie 30 Subkategorien zugeordnet. Die Oberkategorie Fachverbände (n = 60) weist die höchste Akteursanzahl auf, gefolgt von zivilgesellschaftlichen (n = 49) und staatlichen Akteuren (n = 40). Neben einer tabellarischen und grafischen Darstellung wurde eine interaktive Akteursübersicht erstellt (www.noeg.org). Diskussion Diese Arbeit bietet eine umfangreiche Übersicht über Akteure der öffentlichen Gesundheit in Deutschland und verdeutlicht die Breite der deutschen Public-Health-Landschaft. Die Ergebnisse bieten neue Möglichkeiten zur Vernetzung und können Nachwuchsfachkräften Berufswege aufzeigen. Ausgehend von dieser Arbeit sind ergänzende Forschungsarbeiten zu Public-Health-Akteuren sinnvoll.

show abstract

Section: Hintergrundunclassified

Überregionale Public-Health-Akteure in Deutschland – eine Bestandsaufnahme und Kategorisierung

Hommes

Mohsenpour

Kropff

et al. 2021

Bundesgesundheitsbl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed significant challenges in LHAs’ implementation and embedding of EIDM processes. These challenges include among others, limited access to scientific information [ 27 , 28 ], a lack of institutionally anchored collaboration between academia and practice in many places [ 29 , 30 ], and substantial personnel, material and time constraints that make accessing, reviewing, and applying research findings into local contexts much more difficult [ 28 , 31 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing evidence ecosystems in the public health service: Development of a framework for designing tailored training programs

Arnold,

Bimczok,

Clemens

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of local evidence ecosystems in which academia and practice in the Public Health Service (PHS) are interconnected. However, appropriate organizational structures and well-trained staff are lacking and evidence use in local public health decision-making has to be integrated into training programs in Germany. To address this issue, we developed a framework incorporating a toolbox to conceptualize training programs designed to qualify public health professionals for working at the interface between academia and practice. We conducted a scoping review of training programs, key-informant interviews with public health experts, and a multi-professional stakeholder workshop and triangulated their output. The resulting toolbox consists of four core elements, encompassing 15 parameters: (1) content-related aspects, (2) context-related aspects, (3) aspects relevant for determining the training format, and (4) aspects relevant for consolidation and further development. Guiding questions with examples supports the application of the toolbox. Additionally, we introduced a how-to-use guidance to streamline the creation of new training programs, fostering knowledge transfer at the academia-practice interface, equipping public health researchers and practitioners with relevant skills for needs-based PHS research. By promoting collaborative training development across institutions, our approach encourages cross-institutional cooperation, enhances evidence utilization, and enables efficient resource allocation. This collaborative effort in developing training programs within local evidence ecosystems not only strengthens the scientific and practical impact but also lays a foundation for implementing complex public health measures effectively at the local level.

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed significant challenges in LHAs’ implementation and embedding of EIDM processes. These challenges include among others, limited access to scientific information (26, 27), a lack of institutionally anchored collaboration between academia and practice in many places (28, 29), and substantial personnel, material and time constraints that make accessing, reviewing, and applying research findings into local contexts much more difficult (30, 27).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing evidence ecosystems in the public health service: Development of a seven-step framework for designing tailored training programs

Arnold,

Bimczok,

Clemens

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of local evidence-ecosystems in which academia and practice in the Public Health Service (PHS) are interconnected. However, appropriate organizational structures and well-trained staff are lacking and evidence use in local public health decision-making has to be integrated into training programs in Germany. To address this issue, we developed a toolbox to conceptualize training programs designed to qualify public health professionals for working at the interface between academia and practice. We conducted a scoping review of training programs, key-informant interviews with public health experts, and a multi-professional stakeholder workshop and triangulated their output. The toolbox consists of four core elements, encompassing 15 parameters: (1) content-related aspects, (2) context-related aspects, (3) aspects relevant for determining the training format, and (4) aspects relevant for consolidation and further development. Guiding questions with examples supports the application of the toolbox. The developed seven-step frame-work aims to facilitate new training programs for knowledge-transfer at the academia-practice interface, equipping public health researchers and practitioners with relevant skills for needs-based PHS research. The joint development of training approaches can foster cross-institutional collaboration and enhance evidence utilization, resulting in long-term resource savings and a stronger evidence base for implementing complex public health measures on site. In this way, co-development of tailored solutions within the local evidence ecosystem has the potential to enhance both scientific and practical impact.

show abstract

COVID-19: Besondere Herausforderungen an Public Health in Theorie und Praxis

Cited by 5 publications

References 23 publications

Überregionale Public-Health-Akteure in Deutschland – eine Bestandsaufnahme und Kategorisierung

Überregionale Public-Health-Akteure in Deutschland – eine Bestandsaufnahme und Kategorisierung

Implementing evidence ecosystems in the public health service: Development of a framework for designing tailored training programs

Implementing evidence ecosystems in the public health service: Development of a seven-step framework for designing tailored training programs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About